Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1208838 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-17 21:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-18 17:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
Please revert 08439fec266c3cc5702953b4f54bdf5649357de0 Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> - 2015-08-17 21:50 +0200
Re: Please revert 08439fec266c3cc5702953b4f54bdf5649357de0 Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2015-08-18 03:00 +0200
Re: Please revert 08439fec266c3cc5702953b4f54bdf5649357de0 Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> - 2015-08-18 17:20 +0200
| From | Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 21:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Please revert 08439fec266c3cc5702953b4f54bdf5649357de0 |
| Message-ID | <pYyzT-a5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi Theodore, as you already know, commit 08439fec266c (ext4: remove block_device_ejected) caused a regression for (at least) USB attached storage devices. You provided a fix for the regression by reverting that commit in b9e43f49f672 (Revert "ext4: remove block_device_ejected"). This revert is, currently, on linux-next but broken commit is part of v4.1-final and, thus, part of v4.1 LTS. Could you please mark your revert for v4.1+ stable ? If it's not too late to get it in v4.2-final, that would be great, otherwise we a Cc stable would suffice anyway. In summary, commit 08439fec266c needs to be reverted on both v4.1-stable and v4.2. Thanks -- balbi
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 03:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pYDpU-7eG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1208838 |
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi Theodore,
>
> as you already know, commit 08439fec266c (ext4: remove
> block_device_ejected) caused a regression for (at least) USB attached
> storage devices.
>
> You provided a fix for the regression by reverting that commit in
> b9e43f49f672 (Revert "ext4: remove block_device_ejected"). This
> revert is, currently, on linux-next but broken commit is part of
> v4.1-final and, thus, part of v4.1 LTS.
>
> Could you please mark your revert for v4.1+ stable ? If it's not too
> late to get it in v4.2-final, that would be great, otherwise we a Cc
> stable would suffice anyway.
>
> In summary, commit 08439fec266c needs to be reverted on both v4.1-stable
> and v4.2.
Already done. See the latest version of the dev branch. I noticed
this morning that I needed to mark it for stable, and took care of it.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 17:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pYQQb-1B4-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1208987 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 08:54:37PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi Theodore, > > > > as you already know, commit 08439fec266c (ext4: remove > > block_device_ejected) caused a regression for (at least) USB attached > > storage devices. > > > > You provided a fix for the regression by reverting that commit in > > b9e43f49f672 (Revert "ext4: remove block_device_ejected"). This > > revert is, currently, on linux-next but broken commit is part of > > v4.1-final and, thus, part of v4.1 LTS. > > > > Could you please mark your revert for v4.1+ stable ? If it's not too > > late to get it in v4.2-final, that would be great, otherwise we a Cc > > stable would suffice anyway. > > > > In summary, commit 08439fec266c needs to be reverted on both v4.1-stable > > and v4.2. > > Already done. See the latest version of the dev branch. I noticed > this morning that I needed to mark it for stable, and took care of it. cool, thanks -- balbi
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web