Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1208139 > unrolled thread

Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 38/46] sched: scheduler-driven cpu frequency selection

Started byPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
First post2015-08-15 22:00 +0200
Last post2015-08-15 22:00 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 38/46] sched: scheduler-driven cpu frequency  selection Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-08-15 22:00 +0200

#1208139 — Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 38/46] sched: scheduler-driven cpu frequency selection

FromPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date2015-08-15 22:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFCv5 PATCH 38/46] sched: scheduler-driven cpu frequency selection
Message-ID<pXPMu-2Vm-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:24:21PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> +void cpufreq_sched_set_cap(int cpu, unsigned long capacity)
> +{
> +	unsigned int freq_new, cpu_tmp;
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> +	struct gov_data *gd;
> +	unsigned long capacity_max = 0;
> +
> +	/* update per-cpu capacity request */
> +	__this_cpu_write(pcpu_capacity, capacity);
> +
> +	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(policy)) {
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!policy->governor_data)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	gd = policy->governor_data;
> +
> +	/* bail early if we are throttled */
> +	if (ktime_before(ktime_get(), gd->throttle))
> +		goto out;

Isn't this the wrong place to throttle? Suppose you're getting multiple
new tasks placed on this CPU, the first one would trigger this callback
and start increasing freq..

While we're still changing freq. (and therefore throttled), another task
comes in which would again raise the freq.

With this scheme you loose the latter freq. change and will not
re-evaluate.

Any scheme that limits the callbacks to the actual hardware will have to
buffer requests and once the hardware returns (be it through an
interrupt or timeout) issue the latest request.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web