Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1205471 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] clk: improve handling of orphan clocks

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] clk: improve handling of orphan clocks Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2015-08-12 00:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] clk: improve handling of orphan clocks Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2015-08-12 10:30 +0200

#1205471 — Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] clk: improve handling of orphan clocks

On 07/30, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:57:33AM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > 
> > did this lead anywhere meanwhile.
> > 
> > Last I remember the change to orphan handling made sunxi fail, but
> > I'm still hoping to get this usable at some point :-)
> 
> To be honest, I don't know what the current status is. I haven't get
> any news since that mail.
> 
> I started to move a significant portion of our clocks to
> CLK_OF_DECLARE, but not all of them are (which probably make the
> situation worse for the time being).
> 

Sorry, I think we're still waiting for the critical clocks stuff
to settle down so that Sunxi can use that instead of calling
clk_prepare_enable() in init code. For now, I've put the first
patch of the two into clk-next so that we can have proper orphan
tracking. Hopefully we resolve critical clocks soon so that we
can merge the defer part.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1205697

Am Dienstag, 11. August 2015, 15:34:09 schrieb Stephen Boyd:
> On 07/30, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:57:33AM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > > did this lead anywhere meanwhile.
> > > 
> > > Last I remember the change to orphan handling made sunxi fail, but
> > > I'm still hoping to get this usable at some point :-)
> > 
> > To be honest, I don't know what the current status is. I haven't get
> > any news since that mail.
> > 
> > I started to move a significant portion of our clocks to
> > CLK_OF_DECLARE, but not all of them are (which probably make the
> > situation worse for the time being).
> 
> Sorry, I think we're still waiting for the critical clocks stuff
> to settle down so that Sunxi can use that instead of calling
> clk_prepare_enable() in init code. For now, I've put the first
> patch of the two into clk-next so that we can have proper orphan
> tracking. Hopefully we resolve critical clocks soon so that we
> can merge the defer part.

great :-)

For the defer-part you came up with a better solution than mine anyway, if I 
remember correctly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web