Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1205657 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v2] serial: max310x: Fix out of bounds access

Started bySu Kang Yin <cantona@cantona.net>
First post2015-08-12 09:30 +0200
Last post2015-08-12 17:20 +0200
Articles 4 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH v2] serial: max310x: Fix out of bounds access Su Kang Yin <cantona@cantona.net> - 2015-08-12 09:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] serial: max310x: Fix out of bounds access Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> - 2015-08-12 12:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2] serial: max310x: Fix out of bounds access Kang Yin Su <cantona@cantona.net> - 2015-08-12 14:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2] serial: max310x: Fix out of bounds access Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-08-12 17:20 +0200

#1205657 — [PATCH v2] serial: max310x: Fix out of bounds access

FromSu Kang Yin <cantona@cantona.net>
Date2015-08-12 09:30 +0200
Subject[PATCH v2] serial: max310x: Fix out of bounds access
Message-ID<pWyE1-5X6-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Max310x driver supports up to 4 UART devices but array size of
"struct max310x_one" is set to 1. That leads to out of bounds
access on UART port registration.

This patch fixed it by increase the array size to 4 which is
maximum supported UART.

Signed-off-by: Su Kang Yin <cantona@cantona.net>
---
v2: add Signed-off-by: line.

 drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c b/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c
index 182549f..b523552 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@
 #define MAX310X_MAJOR			204
 #define MAX310X_MINOR			209
 
+/* Maximum supported device */
+#define MAX_DEVICE			4
+
 /* MAX310X register definitions */
 #define MAX310X_RHR_REG			(0x00) /* RX FIFO */
 #define MAX310X_THR_REG			(0x00) /* TX FIFO */
@@ -273,7 +276,7 @@ struct max310x_port {
 #ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB
 	struct gpio_chip	gpio;
 #endif
-	struct max310x_one	p[0];
+	struct max310x_one	p[MAX_DEVICE];
 };
 
 static u8 max310x_port_read(struct uart_port *port, u8 reg)
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1205931

FromAlexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Date2015-08-12 12:40 +0200
Message-ID<pWBBU-1Ls-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1205657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--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1205991

FromKang Yin Su <cantona@cantona.net>
Date2015-08-12 14:00 +0200
Message-ID<pWCRk-3tG-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1205931
On 12 August 2015 at 17:46, Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> wrote:
>> Среда, 12 августа 2015, 15:36 +08:00 от cantona <cantona@cantona.net>:
>>
>>
>> added Alexander Shiyan < shc_work@mail.ru >.
>>
>> On 12 August 2015 at 15:22, Su Kang Yin  < cantona@cantona.net > wrote:
>> >Max310x driver supports up to 4 UART devices but array size of
>> >"struct max310x_one" is set to 1. That leads to out of bounds
>> >access on UART port registration.
>> >
>> >This patch fixed it by increase the array size to 4 which is
>> >maximum supported UART.
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Su Kang Yin < cantona@cantona.net >
>> >---
> ...
>
> This seems incorrect. The number of ports is allocated dynamically by:
> ...
> /* Alloc port structure */
> s = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*s) + sizeof(struct max310x_one) * devtype->nr, GFP_KERNEL);
> ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> ---
>


Oh, my bad.  But it looks confusing. So we must ensure "struct
max310x_one p[0]"  must the last element of "struct max310x_port".

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1206205

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2015-08-12 17:20 +0200
Message-ID<pWFYS-8aR-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1205991
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 07:50:25PM +0800, Kang Yin Su wrote:
> On 12 August 2015 at 17:46, Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> wrote:
> >> Среда, 12 августа 2015, 15:36 +08:00 от cantona <cantona@cantona.net>:
> >>
> >>
> >> added Alexander Shiyan < shc_work@mail.ru >.
> >>
> >> On 12 August 2015 at 15:22, Su Kang Yin  < cantona@cantona.net > wrote:
> >> >Max310x driver supports up to 4 UART devices but array size of
> >> >"struct max310x_one" is set to 1. That leads to out of bounds
> >> >access on UART port registration.
> >> >
> >> >This patch fixed it by increase the array size to 4 which is
> >> >maximum supported UART.
> >> >
> >> >Signed-off-by: Su Kang Yin < cantona@cantona.net >
> >> >---
> > ...
> >
> > This seems incorrect. The number of ports is allocated dynamically by:
> > ...
> > /* Alloc port structure */
> > s = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*s) + sizeof(struct max310x_one) * devtype->nr, GFP_KERNEL);
> > ...
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > ---
> >
> 
> 
> Oh, my bad.  But it looks confusing. So we must ensure "struct
> max310x_one p[0]"  must the last element of "struct max310x_port".

Yes, that is a very common pattern we use in the kernel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web