Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1204638 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-11 01:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-11 11:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RESEND][PATCH 3/4] ARM: davinci: Set proper SPI prescale limit value "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@ti.com> - 2015-08-11 01:50 +0200
Re: [RESEND][PATCH 3/4] ARM: davinci: Set proper SPI prescale limit value Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> - 2015-08-11 09:00 +0200
Re: [RESEND][PATCH 3/4] ARM: davinci: Set proper SPI prescale limit value Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-08-11 11:10 +0200
Re: [RESEND][PATCH 3/4] ARM: davinci: Set proper SPI prescale limit value Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> - 2015-08-11 11:30 +0200
Re: [RESEND][PATCH 3/4] ARM: davinci: Set proper SPI prescale limit value Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-08-11 11:30 +0200
| From | "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 01:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND][PATCH 3/4] ARM: davinci: Set proper SPI prescale limit value |
| Message-ID | <pW4Zj-4Ap-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 07/24/2015 06:50 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Wednesday 22 July 2015 06:02 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote: >> SPI Davinci driver has been updated to allow SOCs to specify their minimum >> prescale value. Update the various SOCs board files that use this driver with >> their proper prescaler limit. >> >> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com> > Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> > > in case Mark is okay to take it through his tree. It does not clash with > anything else I have for mach-davinci. > > Thanks, > Sekhar > ping. Patches 1 and 2 have already been pulled into Mark's spi tree and are currently in in linux-next. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 09:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pWbHs-5QC-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1204638 |
On Tuesday 11 August 2015 05:17 AM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote: > > > On 07/24/2015 06:50 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Wednesday 22 July 2015 06:02 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote: >>> SPI Davinci driver has been updated to allow SOCs to specify their minimum >>> prescale value. Update the various SOCs board files that use this driver with >>> their proper prescaler limit. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com> >> Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> >> >> in case Mark is okay to take it through his tree. It does not clash with >> anything else I have for mach-davinci. >> >> Thanks, >> Sekhar >> > ping. Patches 1 and 2 have already been pulled into Mark's spi tree and are currently in in linux-next. Mark, can you apply this patch to your tree as well? Thats the preferred route for me. If thats not an option for you, can you confirm that the topic/davinci branch of your spi tree is an immutable commit I can base my pull request to ARM-SoC on? Thanks, Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 11:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pWdJg-zE-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1204829 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:28:21PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Tuesday 11 August 2015 05:17 AM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote: > > ping. Patches 1 and 2 have already been pulled into Mark's spi tree and are currently in in linux-next. > Mark, can you apply this patch to your tree as well? Thats the preferred > route for me. > If thats not an option for you, can you confirm that the topic/davinci > branch of your spi tree is an immutable commit I can base my pull > request to ARM-SoC on? Why would there be any interdependency between the the two trees, that would be very unusual? Adding a new value to DT doesn't need the kernel to understand it and the driver should be compatible with existing DTs. If there *is* some dependency that suggests the driver update has problems... In any case I don't have a copy of the patch any more.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 11:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pWe2C-Wm-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1204902 |
On Tuesday 11 August 2015 02:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:28:21PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Tuesday 11 August 2015 05:17 AM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote: > >>> ping. Patches 1 and 2 have already been pulled into Mark's spi tree and are currently in in linux-next. > >> Mark, can you apply this patch to your tree as well? Thats the preferred >> route for me. > >> If thats not an option for you, can you confirm that the topic/davinci >> branch of your spi tree is an immutable commit I can base my pull >> request to ARM-SoC on? > > Why would there be any interdependency between the the two trees, that > would be very unusual? Adding a new value to DT doesn't need the kernel > to understand it and the driver should be compatible with existing DTs. > If there *is* some dependency that suggests the driver update has > problems... The dependency is because of platform data. Patch 2/4 adds a new platform data member 'prescaler_limit' which this patch populates for DaVinci devices using legacy booting. > In any case I don't have a copy of the patch any more. I can resend this patch to you with my ack included. Thanks, Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 11:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pWe2C-Wm-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1204916 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 02:54:33PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Tuesday 11 August 2015 02:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Why would there be any interdependency between the the two trees, that > > would be very unusual? Adding a new value to DT doesn't need the kernel > > to understand it and the driver should be compatible with existing DTs. > > If there *is* some dependency that suggests the driver update has > > problems... > The dependency is because of platform data. Patch 2/4 adds a new > platform data member 'prescaler_limit' which this patch populates for > DaVinci devices using legacy booting. Ugh, you still have legacy platforms :( > > In any case I don't have a copy of the patch any more. > I can resend this patch to you with my ack included. I guess.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web