Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1201738 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-06 15:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-11 10:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 13 on this page of 33 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2015-08-06 15:50 +0200
[PATCH v4 4/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4x12 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2015-08-06 15:50 +0200
[PATCH v4 2/6] clk: samsung: exynos4x12: add cpu clock configuration data and instantiate cpu clock Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2015-08-06 15:50 +0200
[PATCH v4 1/6] cpufreq: make scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attr available when boost is enabled Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2015-08-06 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] cpufreq: make scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attr available when boost is enabled Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-08-07 05:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] cpufreq: make scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attr available when boost is enabled Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2015-08-07 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] cpufreq: make scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attr available when boost is enabled Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-08-07 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] cpufreq: make scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attr available when boost is enabled Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2015-08-07 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] cpufreq: make scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attr available when boost is enabled Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-08-07 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] cpufreq: make scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attr available when boost is enabled "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-08-08 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] cpufreq: make scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attr available when boost is enabled Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-08-08 04:10 +0200
[PATCH v4 6/6] cpufreq: remove no longer needed CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW config option Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2015-08-06 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] cpufreq: remove no longer needed CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW config option Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-08-07 06:40 +0200
[PATCH v4 5/6] cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos4x12 specific cpufreq driver support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2015-08-06 15:50 +0200
[PATCH v4 3/6] ARM: dts: Exynos4x12: add CPU OPP and regulator supply property Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2015-08-06 15:50 +0200
RE: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> - 2015-08-07 02:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-08-07 06:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-08-07 06:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-08-07 06:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-08-07 06:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-08-07 07:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-08-07 07:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2015-08-07 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-08-07 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2015-08-07 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-08-07 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-08-08 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-08-08 04:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-08-08 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-08-08 16:00 +0200
RE: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> - 2015-08-10 03:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-08-11 04:30 +0200
RE: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> - 2015-08-11 10:00 +0200
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 07:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pUHV8-5Oo-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1202283 |
On 07.08.2015 13:30, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 07-08-15, 13:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Still patches 1/6 and 6/6 need your acks. Is the patch 1/6 a >> prerequisite for others? It does not look like a prerequisite... but it >> was put at the beginning of the patchset. > > Patch 1/6 is required to get boost working, that's all.. Not sure how > important is that. Anyway, that will work without 1/6 as well, all you > need to do is enable CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW in you .config. > > Anyway, it should go via pm tree and can be sent separately. Thanks for explanation. As fair as I understand, Bartlomiej wanted to merge this in a way which would avoid loosing the boost mode. Kukjin prepared topic branches for previous cpu-freq/clk stuff so maybe everything could go through PM? Kukjin, are you fine with that? Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 07:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform |
| Message-ID | <pUIeu-6qG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1202288 |
On 07-08-15, 13:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Thanks for explanation. As fair as I understand, Bartlomiej wanted to > merge this in a way which would avoid loosing the boost mode. Kukjin > prepared topic branches for previous cpu-freq/clk stuff so maybe > everything could go through PM? We aren't loosing anything at all. There can be two cases here: 1. Patch 1/6 and 6/6 make it to 4.3 (with suggested changes) via PM tree: - All will work fine in this case, no issues at all.. 2. They don't make it: - Even in this case, nothing will break. Users can just enable a config option and that's all.. So, no need to divert things into another tree this late. Over that, Rafael will not be around for 2 weeks now (Plumbers and other stuff) .. So, just target the cpufreq core changes via PM tree.. rest is just fine. I hope that makes sense :) -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 13:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pUOae-6Cl-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1202291 |
Hi, On Friday, August 07, 2015 10:48:26 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 07-08-15, 13:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Thanks for explanation. As fair as I understand, Bartlomiej wanted to > > merge this in a way which would avoid loosing the boost mode. Kukjin > > prepared topic branches for previous cpu-freq/clk stuff so maybe > > everything could go through PM? > > We aren't loosing anything at all. There can be two cases here: > > 1. Patch 1/6 and 6/6 make it to 4.3 (with suggested changes) via PM tree: > - All will work fine in this case, no issues at all.. > > 2. They don't make it: > - Even in this case, nothing will break. Users can just enable a > config option and that's all.. Users don't need to enable the config option to get boost functionality working. It is only needed to get scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attribute visible (which lists available boost freqs) when using cpufreq-dt driver. Also the config option in question is not user visible. The worst thing that happens if these 2 PM patches don't make it in time is that there will be no scaling_boost_freqs available when using cpufreq-dt driver. Which is not very important from Exynos4x12 POV as it only supports single boost freq currently. > So, no need to divert things into another tree this late. I agree. > Over that, Rafael will not be around for 2 weeks now (Plumbers and > other stuff) .. > > So, just target the cpufreq core changes via PM tree.. rest is just > fine. > > I hope that makes sense :) Yes. :) Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 13:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform |
| Message-ID | <pUOjU-6NI-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1202604 |
On 07-08-15, 13:31, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Users don't need to enable the config option to get boost > functionality working. It is only needed to get scaling_boost_freqs > sysfs attribute visible (which lists available boost freqs) when > using cpufreq-dt driver. Also the config option in question is not > user visible. By users I meant the people who will prepare the build images for the release. They can just enable the config option :) > The worst thing that happens if these 2 PM patches don't make it > in time is that there will be no scaling_boost_freqs available > when using cpufreq-dt driver. Which is not very important from > Exynos4x12 POV as it only supports single boost freq currently. Right. So, now that your patch is Acked, send 1/6 and 6/6 separately to pm-list and Rafael can get them merged himself.. I hope, your 6/6 patch will change a bit now ? -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 13:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pUOjU-6NI-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1202606 |
On Friday, August 07, 2015 05:09:50 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 07-08-15, 13:31, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Users don't need to enable the config option to get boost > > functionality working. It is only needed to get scaling_boost_freqs > > sysfs attribute visible (which lists available boost freqs) when > > using cpufreq-dt driver. Also the config option in question is not > > user visible. > > By users I meant the people who will prepare the build images for the > release. They can just enable the config option :) OK. > > The worst thing that happens if these 2 PM patches don't make it > > in time is that there will be no scaling_boost_freqs available > > when using cpufreq-dt driver. Which is not very important from > > Exynos4x12 POV as it only supports single boost freq currently. > > Right. So, now that your patch is Acked, send 1/6 and 6/6 separately > to pm-list and Rafael can get them merged himself.. > > I hope, your 6/6 patch will change a bit now ? Hmm, wait. Patch 6/6 depends on earlier changes. I cannot remove the config option in question now as it is currently used by exynos-cpufreq specific boost support. Patch 1/6 can be applied now but 6/6 needs to wait for patches 2-5 to be applied first. Actually 6/6 is trivial and can be applied later in v4.3 cycle or even in v4.4 one. Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 14:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform |
| Message-ID | <pUOtA-6YZ-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1202616 |
On 07-08-15, 13:47, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Hmm, wait. Patch 6/6 depends on earlier changes. I cannot remove > the config option in question now as it is currently used by > exynos-cpufreq specific boost support. Patch 1/6 can be applied > now but 6/6 needs to wait for patches 2-5 to be applied first. > > Actually 6/6 is trivial and can be applied later in v4.3 cycle or > even in v4.4 one. Ack. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 00:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform |
| Message-ID | <pUXQd-3Tn-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1202623 |
On Friday, August 07, 2015 05:26:27 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 07-08-15, 13:47, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Hmm, wait. Patch 6/6 depends on earlier changes. I cannot remove > > the config option in question now as it is currently used by > > exynos-cpufreq specific boost support. Patch 1/6 can be applied > > now but 6/6 needs to wait for patches 2-5 to be applied first. > > > > Actually 6/6 is trivial and can be applied later in v4.3 cycle or > > even in v4.4 one. > > Ack. OK, so please let me know which patches you want me to pick up. Ideally, I'd prefer them to be resent in a separate series with ACKs and all with a cover letter clearly stating whose tree they are being targeted at. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 04:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform |
| Message-ID | <pV1Ka-1A3-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1203047 |
On 08-08-15, 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > OK, so please let me know which patches you want me to pick up. > > Ideally, I'd prefer them to be resent in a separate series with ACKs and all > with a cover letter clearly stating whose tree they are being targeted at. He already sent it separately, let me send a confirmatory mail in reply to that. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 09:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pV6JP-jv-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1203148 |
W dniu 08.08.2015 o 11:07, Viresh Kumar pisze: > On 08-08-15, 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> OK, so please let me know which patches you want me to pick up. >> >> Ideally, I'd prefer them to be resent in a separate series with ACKs and all >> with a cover letter clearly stating whose tree they are being targeted at. > > He already sent it separately, let me send a confirmatory mail in > reply to that. Dear Kukjin, Can you apply the 2-5 of this series to v4.3? It's getting late but maybe they still could go? Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 16:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform |
| Message-ID | <pVcPf-wo-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1203190 |
On 08-08-15, 16:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Can you apply the 2-5 of this series to v4.3? It's getting late but > maybe they still could go? FWIW, 1/6 (updated version) is already applied by Rafael. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 03:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pVK4x-6I7-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1203190 |
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > W dniu 08.08.2015 o 11:07, Viresh Kumar pisze: > > On 08-08-15, 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> OK, so please let me know which patches you want me to pick up. > >> > >> Ideally, I'd prefer them to be resent in a separate series with ACKs and all > >> with a cover letter clearly stating whose tree they are being targeted at. > > > > He already sent it separately, let me send a confirmatory mail in > > reply to that. > > Dear Kukjin, > > Can you apply the 2-5 of this series to v4.3? It's getting late but > maybe they still could go? > Once my previous pull-request landed into arm-soc, I'll try to send out this series 2-5 for v4.3. Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 04:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pW7u9-8lO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1203728 |
On 10.08.2015 10:27, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> >> W dniu 08.08.2015 o 11:07, Viresh Kumar pisze: >>> On 08-08-15, 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>> OK, so please let me know which patches you want me to pick up. >>>> >>>> Ideally, I'd prefer them to be resent in a separate series with ACKs and all >>>> with a cover letter clearly stating whose tree they are being targeted at. >>> >>> He already sent it separately, let me send a confirmatory mail in >>> reply to that. >> >> Dear Kukjin, >> >> Can you apply the 2-5 of this series to v4.3? It's getting late but >> maybe they still could go? >> > Once my previous pull-request landed into arm-soc, I'll try to send out this > series 2-5 for v4.3. Additionally (better late than never): Patches 2-5 tested on Trats2 board (Exynos4412) Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 10:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pWcDw-7fm-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1204700 |
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 10.08.2015 10:27, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> > >> W dniu 08.08.2015 o 11:07, Viresh Kumar pisze: > >>> On 08-08-15, 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>>> OK, so please let me know which patches you want me to pick up. > >>>> > >>>> Ideally, I'd prefer them to be resent in a separate series with ACKs and all > >>>> with a cover letter clearly stating whose tree they are being targeted at. > >>> > >>> He already sent it separately, let me send a confirmatory mail in > >>> reply to that. > >> > >> Dear Kukjin, > >> > >> Can you apply the 2-5 of this series to v4.3? It's getting late but > >> maybe they still could go? > >> > > Once my previous pull-request landed into arm-soc, I'll try to send out this > > series 2-5 for v4.3. > > Additionally (better late than never): Sure ;-) > Patches 2-5 tested on Trats2 board (Exynos4412) > > Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> > Applied with Krzysztof's 'Tested-by'. Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web