Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1204454 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Glenn Griffin <ggriffin.kernel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-10 19:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-10 20:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2] openvswitch: Fix L4 checksum handling when dealing with IP fragments Glenn Griffin <ggriffin.kernel@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] openvswitch: Fix L4 checksum handling when dealing with IP fragments David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-08-10 20:30 +0200
| From | Glenn Griffin <ggriffin.kernel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 19:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] openvswitch: Fix L4 checksum handling when dealing with IP fragments |
| Message-ID | <pVZmV-4Uw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 02:03:28PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Glenn Griffin <ggriffin.kernel@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 09:56:54 -0700 > > > openvswitch modifies the L4 checksum of a packet when modifying > > the ip address. When an IP packet is fragmented only the first > > fragment contains an L4 header and checksum. Prior to this change > > openvswitch would modify all fragments, modifying application data > > in non-first fragments, causing checksum failures in the > > reassembled packet. > > > > Signed-off-by: Glenn Griffin <ggriffin.kernel@gmail.com> > > --- > > Changes in v2: > > - Compare frag_off in network byte order rather than host byte order > > Applied and queued up for -stable. I noticed this change didn't seem to make it into 4.2-rc6. I'm not too familiar with the release schedule so wasn't sure if that was expected or an oversight. Will this remain queued up until the 4.3 merge window opens? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 20:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pVZZD-5SK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1204454 |
From: Glenn Griffin <ggriffin.kernel@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 10:43:16 -0700 > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 02:03:28PM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: Glenn Griffin <ggriffin.kernel@gmail.com> >> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 09:56:54 -0700 >> >> > openvswitch modifies the L4 checksum of a packet when modifying >> > the ip address. When an IP packet is fragmented only the first >> > fragment contains an L4 header and checksum. Prior to this change >> > openvswitch would modify all fragments, modifying application data >> > in non-first fragments, causing checksum failures in the >> > reassembled packet. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Glenn Griffin <ggriffin.kernel@gmail.com> >> > --- >> > Changes in v2: >> > - Compare frag_off in network byte order rather than host byte order >> >> Applied and queued up for -stable. > > I noticed this change didn't seem to make it into 4.2-rc6. I'm not too > familiar with the release schedule so wasn't sure if that was expected > or an oversight. Will this remain queued up until the 4.3 merge window > opens? It's in my 'net' tree and will be pushed to Linus's tree at a time that I deem appropriate. Usually I try to push to Linus one every week or so, in order for changes to soak and get tested in my tree before they get pushed to his. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web