Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1202340 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] kvm:s390:Fix assumption that kvm_set_irq_routing is always run successfully

Started byPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
First post2015-08-07 09:20 +0200
Last post2015-08-10 17:50 +0200
Articles 2 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] kvm:s390:Fix assumption that kvm_set_irq_routing is  always run successfully Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2015-08-07 09:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] kvm:s390:Fix assumption that kvm_set_irq_routing is  always run successfully Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2015-08-10 17:50 +0200

#1202340 — Re: [PATCH] kvm:s390:Fix assumption that kvm_set_irq_routing is always run successfully

FromPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date2015-08-07 09:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kvm:s390:Fix assumption that kvm_set_irq_routing is always run successfully
Message-ID<pUK6D-N5-33@gated-at.bofh.it>

On 06/08/2015 19:05, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This fixes the assumption that kvm_set_irq_routing is always run
> successfully by instead making it equal to the variable r which
> we use for returning in the function kvm_arch_vm_ioctl instead
> of making r equal to zero when calling this particular function
> and incorrectly making the caller of kvm_arch_vm_ioctl think
> the function has run successfully.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index f32f843..660860f 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -879,8 +879,7 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
>  		if (kvm->arch.use_irqchip) {
>  			/* Set up dummy routing. */
>  			memset(&routing, 0, sizeof(routing));
> -			kvm_set_irq_routing(kvm, &routing, 0, 0);
> -			r = 0;
> +			r = kvm_set_irq_routing(kvm, &routing, 0, 0);
>  		}
>  		break;
>  	}
> 

Seems good.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1204384

FromPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date2015-08-10 17:50 +0200
Message-ID<pVXuO-2cJ-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1202340

On 10/08/2015 17:21, nick wrote:
> > Seems good.
> > 
> > Paolo
>
> If it makes it easier for you to trust my patches I can show at least 10 bug fixes for other subsystems
> to prove that I am trying to do this correctly.

That's up to those maintainers...

I definitely see some improvement in your patches, though I still
haven't answered the submissions that in my opinion are a bit more
problematic.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web