Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1201447 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-06 07:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-06 18:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: switchdev: support static FDB addresses Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2015-08-06 07:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: switchdev: support static FDB addresses Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: switchdev: support static FDB addresses Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2015-08-06 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: switchdev: support static FDB addresses Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 18:40 +0200
| From | Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 07:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: switchdev: support static FDB addresses |
| Message-ID | <pUmdY-86Q-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
This patch adds a is_static boolean to the switchdev_obj_fdb structure,
in order to set the ndm_state to either NUD_NOARP or NUD_REACHABLE.
Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
---
include/net/switchdev.h | 1 +
net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/switchdev.h b/include/net/switchdev.h
index e90e1a0..0e296b8 100644
--- a/include/net/switchdev.h
+++ b/include/net/switchdev.h
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ struct switchdev_obj {
struct switchdev_obj_fdb { /* PORT_FDB */
u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
u16 vid;
+ bool is_static;
} fdb;
} u;
};
diff --git a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
index 9db87a3..e9d1cac 100644
--- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
+++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
@@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static int switchdev_port_fdb_dump_cb(struct net_device *dev,
ndm->ndm_flags = NTF_SELF;
ndm->ndm_type = 0;
ndm->ndm_ifindex = dev->ifindex;
- ndm->ndm_state = NUD_REACHABLE;
+ ndm->ndm_state = obj->u.fdb.is_static ? NUD_NOARP : NUD_REACHABLE;
if (nla_put(dump->skb, NDA_LLADDR, ETH_ALEN, obj->u.fdb.addr))
goto nla_put_failure;
--
2.4.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 08:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pUmQF-E0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1201447 |
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Vivien Didelot
<vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
> This patch adds a is_static boolean to the switchdev_obj_fdb structure,
> in order to set the ndm_state to either NUD_NOARP or NUD_REACHABLE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
> ---
> include/net/switchdev.h | 1 +
> net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/switchdev.h b/include/net/switchdev.h
> index e90e1a0..0e296b8 100644
> --- a/include/net/switchdev.h
> +++ b/include/net/switchdev.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ struct switchdev_obj {
> struct switchdev_obj_fdb { /* PORT_FDB */
> u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
> u16 vid;
> + bool is_static;
What do you think about changing this to u16 ndm_state? That way, it
can be used on input (fdb add) and output (fdb dump), and the driver
can privately track the state, kind of like how the bridge keeps
is_static, is_local, etc.
> } fdb;
> } u;
> };
> diff --git a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> index 9db87a3..e9d1cac 100644
> --- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> +++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static int switchdev_port_fdb_dump_cb(struct net_device *dev,
> ndm->ndm_flags = NTF_SELF;
> ndm->ndm_type = 0;
> ndm->ndm_ifindex = dev->ifindex;
> - ndm->ndm_state = NUD_REACHABLE;
> + ndm->ndm_state = obj->u.fdb.is_static ? NUD_NOARP : NUD_REACHABLE;
>
> if (nla_put(dump->skb, NDA_LLADDR, ETH_ALEN, obj->u.fdb.addr))
> goto nla_put_failure;
> --
> 2.4.6
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 16:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: switchdev: support static FDB addresses |
| Message-ID | <pUubv-2Ur-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1201460 |
On 15-08-05 23:28:15, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Vivien Didelot
> <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
> > This patch adds a is_static boolean to the switchdev_obj_fdb structure,
> > in order to set the ndm_state to either NUD_NOARP or NUD_REACHABLE.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
> > ---
> > include/net/switchdev.h | 1 +
> > net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/switchdev.h b/include/net/switchdev.h
> > index e90e1a0..0e296b8 100644
> > --- a/include/net/switchdev.h
> > +++ b/include/net/switchdev.h
> > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ struct switchdev_obj {
> > struct switchdev_obj_fdb { /* PORT_FDB */
> > u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
> > u16 vid;
> > + bool is_static;
>
> What do you think about changing this to u16 ndm_state? That way, it
> can be used on input (fdb add) and output (fdb dump), and the driver
> can privately track the state, kind of like how the bridge keeps
> is_static, is_local, etc.
I'm OK with the change. Should we consider NUD_NONE (0) a valid value?
> > } fdb;
> > } u;
> > };
> > diff --git a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> > index 9db87a3..e9d1cac 100644
> > --- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> > +++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> > @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static int switchdev_port_fdb_dump_cb(struct net_device *dev,
> > ndm->ndm_flags = NTF_SELF;
> > ndm->ndm_type = 0;
> > ndm->ndm_ifindex = dev->ifindex;
> > - ndm->ndm_state = NUD_REACHABLE;
> > + ndm->ndm_state = obj->u.fdb.is_static ? NUD_NOARP : NUD_REACHABLE;
In other word, do we prefer this:
ndm->ndm_state = obj->u.fdb.ndm_state == NUD_NONE ?
NUD_REACHABLE : obj->u.fdb.ndm_state;
Or this (meaning switchdev users cannot leave it blank and must at least
set NUD_REACHABLE themselves):
ndm->ndm_state = obj->u.fdb.ndm_state;
Thanks,
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pUwn1-68O-49@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1201774 |
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Vivien Didelot
<vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
> On 15-08-05 23:28:15, Scott Feldman wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Vivien Didelot
>> <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
>> > This patch adds a is_static boolean to the switchdev_obj_fdb structure,
>> > in order to set the ndm_state to either NUD_NOARP or NUD_REACHABLE.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
>> > ---
>> > include/net/switchdev.h | 1 +
>> > net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 2 +-
>> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/include/net/switchdev.h b/include/net/switchdev.h
>> > index e90e1a0..0e296b8 100644
>> > --- a/include/net/switchdev.h
>> > +++ b/include/net/switchdev.h
>> > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ struct switchdev_obj {
>> > struct switchdev_obj_fdb { /* PORT_FDB */
>> > u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
>> > u16 vid;
>> > + bool is_static;
>>
>> What do you think about changing this to u16 ndm_state? That way, it
>> can be used on input (fdb add) and output (fdb dump), and the driver
>> can privately track the state, kind of like how the bridge keeps
>> is_static, is_local, etc.
>
> I'm OK with the change. Should we consider NUD_NONE (0) a valid value?
>
>> > } fdb;
>> > } u;
>> > };
>> > diff --git a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
>> > index 9db87a3..e9d1cac 100644
>> > --- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
>> > +++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
>> > @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static int switchdev_port_fdb_dump_cb(struct net_device *dev,
>> > ndm->ndm_flags = NTF_SELF;
>> > ndm->ndm_type = 0;
>> > ndm->ndm_ifindex = dev->ifindex;
>> > - ndm->ndm_state = NUD_REACHABLE;
>> > + ndm->ndm_state = obj->u.fdb.is_static ? NUD_NOARP : NUD_REACHABLE;
>
> In other word, do we prefer this:
>
> ndm->ndm_state = obj->u.fdb.ndm_state == NUD_NONE ?
> NUD_REACHABLE : obj->u.fdb.ndm_state;
>
> Or this (meaning switchdev users cannot leave it blank and must at least
> set NUD_REACHABLE themselves):
>
> ndm->ndm_state = obj->u.fdb.ndm_state;
My preference would be this option.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web