Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1201447 > unrolled thread

[PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: switchdev: support static FDB addresses

Started byVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
First post2015-08-06 07:50 +0200
Last post2015-08-06 18:40 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: switchdev: support static FDB addresses Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2015-08-06 07:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: switchdev: support static FDB addresses Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 08:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: switchdev: support static FDB  addresses Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2015-08-06 16:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: switchdev: support static FDB addresses Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 18:40 +0200

#1201447 — [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: switchdev: support static FDB addresses

FromVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Date2015-08-06 07:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: switchdev: support static FDB addresses
Message-ID<pUmdY-86Q-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
This patch adds a is_static boolean to the switchdev_obj_fdb structure,
in order to set the ndm_state to either NUD_NOARP or NUD_REACHABLE.

Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
---
 include/net/switchdev.h   | 1 +
 net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/net/switchdev.h b/include/net/switchdev.h
index e90e1a0..0e296b8 100644
--- a/include/net/switchdev.h
+++ b/include/net/switchdev.h
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ struct switchdev_obj {
 		struct switchdev_obj_fdb {		/* PORT_FDB */
 			u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
 			u16 vid;
+			bool is_static;
 		} fdb;
 	} u;
 };
diff --git a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
index 9db87a3..e9d1cac 100644
--- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
+++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
@@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static int switchdev_port_fdb_dump_cb(struct net_device *dev,
 	ndm->ndm_flags   = NTF_SELF;
 	ndm->ndm_type    = 0;
 	ndm->ndm_ifindex = dev->ifindex;
-	ndm->ndm_state   = NUD_REACHABLE;
+	ndm->ndm_state   = obj->u.fdb.is_static ? NUD_NOARP : NUD_REACHABLE;
 
 	if (nla_put(dump->skb, NDA_LLADDR, ETH_ALEN, obj->u.fdb.addr))
 		goto nla_put_failure;
-- 
2.4.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1201460

FromScott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-06 08:30 +0200
Message-ID<pUmQF-E0-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1201447
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Vivien Didelot
<vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
> This patch adds a is_static boolean to the switchdev_obj_fdb structure,
> in order to set the ndm_state to either NUD_NOARP or NUD_REACHABLE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
> ---
>  include/net/switchdev.h   | 1 +
>  net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/switchdev.h b/include/net/switchdev.h
> index e90e1a0..0e296b8 100644
> --- a/include/net/switchdev.h
> +++ b/include/net/switchdev.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ struct switchdev_obj {
>                 struct switchdev_obj_fdb {              /* PORT_FDB */
>                         u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
>                         u16 vid;
> +                       bool is_static;

What do you think about changing this to u16 ndm_state?  That way, it
can be used on input (fdb add) and output (fdb dump), and the driver
can privately track the state, kind of like how the bridge keeps
is_static, is_local, etc.

>                 } fdb;
>         } u;
>  };
> diff --git a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> index 9db87a3..e9d1cac 100644
> --- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> +++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static int switchdev_port_fdb_dump_cb(struct net_device *dev,
>         ndm->ndm_flags   = NTF_SELF;
>         ndm->ndm_type    = 0;
>         ndm->ndm_ifindex = dev->ifindex;
> -       ndm->ndm_state   = NUD_REACHABLE;
> +       ndm->ndm_state   = obj->u.fdb.is_static ? NUD_NOARP : NUD_REACHABLE;
>
>         if (nla_put(dump->skb, NDA_LLADDR, ETH_ALEN, obj->u.fdb.addr))
>                 goto nla_put_failure;
> --
> 2.4.6
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1201774 — Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: switchdev: support static FDB addresses

FromVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Date2015-08-06 16:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: switchdev: support static FDB addresses
Message-ID<pUubv-2Ur-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1201460
On 15-08-05 23:28:15, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Vivien Didelot
> <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
> > This patch adds a is_static boolean to the switchdev_obj_fdb structure,
> > in order to set the ndm_state to either NUD_NOARP or NUD_REACHABLE.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
> > ---
> >  include/net/switchdev.h   | 1 +
> >  net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/switchdev.h b/include/net/switchdev.h
> > index e90e1a0..0e296b8 100644
> > --- a/include/net/switchdev.h
> > +++ b/include/net/switchdev.h
> > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ struct switchdev_obj {
> >                 struct switchdev_obj_fdb {              /* PORT_FDB */
> >                         u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
> >                         u16 vid;
> > +                       bool is_static;
> 
> What do you think about changing this to u16 ndm_state?  That way, it
> can be used on input (fdb add) and output (fdb dump), and the driver
> can privately track the state, kind of like how the bridge keeps
> is_static, is_local, etc.

I'm OK with the change. Should we consider NUD_NONE (0) a valid value?

> >                 } fdb;
> >         } u;
> >  };
> > diff --git a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> > index 9db87a3..e9d1cac 100644
> > --- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> > +++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> > @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static int switchdev_port_fdb_dump_cb(struct net_device *dev,
> >         ndm->ndm_flags   = NTF_SELF;
> >         ndm->ndm_type    = 0;
> >         ndm->ndm_ifindex = dev->ifindex;
> > -       ndm->ndm_state   = NUD_REACHABLE;
> > +       ndm->ndm_state   = obj->u.fdb.is_static ? NUD_NOARP : NUD_REACHABLE;

In other word, do we prefer this:

    ndm->ndm_state = obj->u.fdb.ndm_state == NUD_NONE ?
                     NUD_REACHABLE : obj->u.fdb.ndm_state;

Or this (meaning switchdev users cannot leave it blank and must at least
set NUD_REACHABLE themselves):

    ndm->ndm_state = obj->u.fdb.ndm_state;

Thanks,
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1201898

FromScott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-06 18:40 +0200
Message-ID<pUwn1-68O-49@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1201774
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Vivien Didelot
<vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
> On 15-08-05 23:28:15, Scott Feldman wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Vivien Didelot
>> <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
>> > This patch adds a is_static boolean to the switchdev_obj_fdb structure,
>> > in order to set the ndm_state to either NUD_NOARP or NUD_REACHABLE.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
>> > ---
>> >  include/net/switchdev.h   | 1 +
>> >  net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 2 +-
>> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/include/net/switchdev.h b/include/net/switchdev.h
>> > index e90e1a0..0e296b8 100644
>> > --- a/include/net/switchdev.h
>> > +++ b/include/net/switchdev.h
>> > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ struct switchdev_obj {
>> >                 struct switchdev_obj_fdb {              /* PORT_FDB */
>> >                         u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
>> >                         u16 vid;
>> > +                       bool is_static;
>>
>> What do you think about changing this to u16 ndm_state?  That way, it
>> can be used on input (fdb add) and output (fdb dump), and the driver
>> can privately track the state, kind of like how the bridge keeps
>> is_static, is_local, etc.
>
> I'm OK with the change. Should we consider NUD_NONE (0) a valid value?
>
>> >                 } fdb;
>> >         } u;
>> >  };
>> > diff --git a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
>> > index 9db87a3..e9d1cac 100644
>> > --- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
>> > +++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
>> > @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static int switchdev_port_fdb_dump_cb(struct net_device *dev,
>> >         ndm->ndm_flags   = NTF_SELF;
>> >         ndm->ndm_type    = 0;
>> >         ndm->ndm_ifindex = dev->ifindex;
>> > -       ndm->ndm_state   = NUD_REACHABLE;
>> > +       ndm->ndm_state   = obj->u.fdb.is_static ? NUD_NOARP : NUD_REACHABLE;
>
> In other word, do we prefer this:
>
>     ndm->ndm_state = obj->u.fdb.ndm_state == NUD_NONE ?
>                      NUD_REACHABLE : obj->u.fdb.ndm_state;
>
> Or this (meaning switchdev users cannot leave it blank and must at least
> set NUD_REACHABLE themselves):
>
>     ndm->ndm_state = obj->u.fdb.ndm_state;

My preference would be this option.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web