Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1202577 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-07 13:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-10 14:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 7 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] tools lib traceevent: add checks for returned EVENT_ERROR type Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2015-08-07 13:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tools lib traceevent: add checks for returned EVENT_ERROR type Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> - 2015-08-07 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tools lib traceevent: add checks for returned EVENT_ERROR type Dean Nelson <dnelson@redhat.com> - 2015-08-07 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tools lib traceevent: add checks for returned EVENT_ERROR type Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> - 2015-08-09 04:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tools lib traceevent: add checks for returned EVENT_ERROR type Dean Nelson <dnelson@redhat.com> - 2015-08-07 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tools lib traceevent: add checks for returned EVENT_ERROR type Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> - 2015-08-09 05:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] tools lib traceevent: add checks for returned EVENT_ERROR type Dean Nelson <dnelson@redhat.com> - 2015-08-10 14:50 +0200
| From | Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 13:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] tools lib traceevent: add checks for returned EVENT_ERROR type |
| Message-ID | <pUNxw-5E5-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 01:08:05PM -0400, Dean Nelson wrote:
> Running the following perf-stat command on an arm64 system produces the
> following result...
>
> [root@aarch64 ~]# perf stat -e kmem:mm_page_alloc -a sleep 1
> Warning: [kmem:mm_page_alloc] function sizeof not defined
> Warning: Error: expected type 4 but read 0
> Segmentation fault
> [root@aarch64 ~]#
hum, what kernel are you running on? I dont see that warning
on my system:
[jolsa@krava perf]$ sudo ./perf stat -e kmem:mm_page_alloc -a sleep 1
Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
227 kmem:mm_page_alloc
1.000762466 seconds time elapsed
Cc-ing Namhyung
jirka
>
> The second warning message and SIGSEGV stem from the issue expressed in the
> first warning message, and are the result of ignoring the EVENT_ERROR type
> returned back through the call chain.
>
> Dealing with the first warning message is beyond the scope of this patch. But
> the second warning is addressed by this patch's first hunk. And the SIGSEGV is
> eliminated by its second hunk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <dnelson@redhat.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> index cc25f05..72e2933 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> @@ -1680,6 +1680,9 @@ process_cond(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg *top, char **tok)
> type = process_arg(event, left, &token);
>
> again:
> + if (type == EVENT_ERROR)
> + goto out_free;
> +
> /* Handle other operations in the arguments */
> if (type == EVENT_OP && strcmp(token, ":") != 0) {
> type = process_op(event, left, &token);
> @@ -1940,7 +1943,7 @@ process_op(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg *arg, char **tok)
>
> type = process_arg_token(event, right, tok, type);
>
> - if (right->type == PRINT_OP &&
> + if (type != EVENT_ERROR && right->type == PRINT_OP &&
> get_op_prio(arg->op.op) < get_op_prio(right->op.op)) {
> struct print_arg tmp;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 14:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] tools lib traceevent: add checks for returned EVENT_ERROR type |
| Message-ID | <pUOMV-7B6-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1202577 |
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 01:08:05PM -0400, Dean Nelson wrote:
>> Running the following perf-stat command on an arm64 system produces the
>> following result...
>>
>> [root@aarch64 ~]# perf stat -e kmem:mm_page_alloc -a sleep 1
>> Warning: [kmem:mm_page_alloc] function sizeof not defined
>> Warning: Error: expected type 4 but read 0
>> Segmentation fault
Oops,
>> [root@aarch64 ~]#
>
> hum, what kernel are you running on? I dont see that warning
> on my system:
>
> [jolsa@krava perf]$ sudo ./perf stat -e kmem:mm_page_alloc -a sleep 1
>
> Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
>
> 227 kmem:mm_page_alloc
>
> 1.000762466 seconds time elapsed
>
> Cc-ing Namhyung
Yeah, it seems his kernel has sizeof() somewhere in the event format.
Anyway, it's not good to see a segfault.
Dean, could you share your event format file?
$ sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kmem/mm_page_alloc/format
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
>>
>> The second warning message and SIGSEGV stem from the issue expressed in the
>> first warning message, and are the result of ignoring the EVENT_ERROR type
>> returned back through the call chain.
>>
>> Dealing with the first warning message is beyond the scope of this patch. But
>> the second warning is addressed by this patch's first hunk. And the SIGSEGV is
>> eliminated by its second hunk.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <dnelson@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
>> index cc25f05..72e2933 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
>> @@ -1680,6 +1680,9 @@ process_cond(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg *top, char **tok)
>> type = process_arg(event, left, &token);
>>
>> again:
>> + if (type == EVENT_ERROR)
>> + goto out_free;
>> +
>> /* Handle other operations in the arguments */
>> if (type == EVENT_OP && strcmp(token, ":") != 0) {
>> type = process_op(event, left, &token);
>> @@ -1940,7 +1943,7 @@ process_op(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg *arg, char **tok)
>>
>> type = process_arg_token(event, right, tok, type);
>>
>> - if (right->type == PRINT_OP &&
>> + if (type != EVENT_ERROR && right->type == PRINT_OP &&
>> get_op_prio(arg->op.op) < get_op_prio(right->op.op)) {
>> struct print_arg tmp;
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dean Nelson <dnelson@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 15:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] tools lib traceevent: add checks for returned EVENT_ERROR type |
| Message-ID | <pUPzj-lu-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1202642 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 08/07/2015 07:16 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 01:08:05PM -0400, Dean Nelson wrote:
>>> Running the following perf-stat command on an arm64 system produces the
>>> following result...
>>>
>>> [root@aarch64 ~]# perf stat -e kmem:mm_page_alloc -a sleep 1
>>> Warning: [kmem:mm_page_alloc] function sizeof not defined
>>> Warning: Error: expected type 4 but read 0
>>> Segmentation fault
>
> Oops,
>
>
>>> [root@aarch64 ~]#
>>
>> hum, what kernel are you running on? I dont see that warning
>> on my system:
>>
>> [jolsa@krava perf]$ sudo ./perf stat -e kmem:mm_page_alloc -a sleep 1
>>
>> Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
>>
>> 227 kmem:mm_page_alloc
>>
>> 1.000762466 seconds time elapsed
>>
>> Cc-ing Namhyung
>
> Yeah, it seems his kernel has sizeof() somewhere in the event format.
> Anyway, it's not good to see a segfault.
>
> Dean, could you share your event format file?
>
> $ sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kmem/mm_page_alloc/format
Sure, I've attached it. See my other email in reply to jirka's question
about what kernel I was running on, for some details about where the
sizeof operator comes from.
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> The second warning message and SIGSEGV stem from the issue expressed in the
>>> first warning message, and are the result of ignoring the EVENT_ERROR type
>>> returned back through the call chain.
>>>
>>> Dealing with the first warning message is beyond the scope of this patch. But
>>> the second warning is addressed by this patch's first hunk. And the SIGSEGV is
>>> eliminated by its second hunk.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <dnelson@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 5 ++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
>>> index cc25f05..72e2933 100644
>>> --- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
>>> +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
>>> @@ -1680,6 +1680,9 @@ process_cond(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg *top, char **tok)
>>> type = process_arg(event, left, &token);
>>>
>>> again:
>>> + if (type == EVENT_ERROR)
>>> + goto out_free;
>>> +
>>> /* Handle other operations in the arguments */
>>> if (type == EVENT_OP && strcmp(token, ":") != 0) {
>>> type = process_op(event, left, &token);
>>> @@ -1940,7 +1943,7 @@ process_op(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg *arg, char **tok)
>>>
>>> type = process_arg_token(event, right, tok, type);
>>>
>>> - if (right->type == PRINT_OP &&
>>> + if (type != EVENT_ERROR && right->type == PRINT_OP &&
>>> get_op_prio(arg->op.op) < get_op_prio(right->op.op)) {
>>> struct print_arg tmp;
>>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 04:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pVoQp-15q-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1202665 |
Hi Dean,
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 08:02:25AM -0500, Dean Nelson wrote:
> On 08/07/2015 07:16 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 01:08:05PM -0400, Dean Nelson wrote:
> >>>Running the following perf-stat command on an arm64 system produces the
> >>>following result...
> >>>
> >>> [root@aarch64 ~]# perf stat -e kmem:mm_page_alloc -a sleep 1
> >>> Warning: [kmem:mm_page_alloc] function sizeof not defined
> >>> Warning: Error: expected type 4 but read 0
> >>> Segmentation fault
> >
> >Oops,
> >
> >
> >>> [root@aarch64 ~]#
> >>
> >>hum, what kernel are you running on? I dont see that warning
> >>on my system:
> >>
> >>[jolsa@krava perf]$ sudo ./perf stat -e kmem:mm_page_alloc -a sleep 1
> >>
> >> Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> >>
> >> 227 kmem:mm_page_alloc
> >>
> >> 1.000762466 seconds time elapsed
> >>
> >>Cc-ing Namhyung
> >
> >Yeah, it seems his kernel has sizeof() somewhere in the event format.
> >Anyway, it's not good to see a segfault.
> >
> >Dean, could you share your event format file?
> >
> > $ sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kmem/mm_page_alloc/format
>
> Sure, I've attached it. See my other email in reply to jirka's question
> about what kernel I was running on, for some details about where the
> sizeof operator comes from.
Thanks for the explanation. It seems there's a problem in processing
'?' operator. I'll take a look at it.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> name: mm_page_alloc
> ID: 360
> format:
> field:unsigned short common_type; offset:0; size:2; signed:0;
> field:unsigned char common_flags; offset:2; size:1; signed:0;
> field:unsigned char common_preempt_count; offset:3; size:1; signed:0;
> field:int common_pid; offset:4; size:4; signed:1;
>
> field:unsigned long pfn; offset:8; size:8; signed:0;
> field:unsigned int order; offset:16; size:4; signed:0;
> field:gfp_t gfp_flags; offset:20; size:4; signed:0;
> field:int migratetype; offset:24; size:4; signed:1;
>
> print fmt: "page=%p pfn=%lu order=%d migratetype=%d gfp_flags=%s", REC->pfn != -1UL ? (((struct page *)((((0xffffffffffffffffUL) << ((42) - 1)) - (1UL << ((16 - 3) * 2 + 3)) - (((((1UL << ((42) - 16)) * sizeof(struct page))) + ((typeof(((1UL << ((42) - 16)) * sizeof(struct page))))(((1UL << ((16 - 3) * 2 + 3)))) - 1)) & ~((typeof(((1UL << ((42) - 16)) * sizeof(struct page))))(((1UL << ((16 - 3) * 2 + 3)))) - 1)) - 0x00010000) + 0x00010000)) + (REC->pfn)) : ((void *)0), REC->pfn != -1UL ? REC->pfn : 0, REC->order, REC->migratetype, (REC->gfp_flags) ? __print_flags(REC->gfp_flags, "|", {(unsigned long)(((((( gfp_t)0x10u) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u) | (( gfp_t)0x20000u)) | (( gfp_t)0x02u)) | (( gfp_t)0x08u)) | (( gfp_t)0x4000u) | (( gfp_t)0x10000u) | (( gfp_t)0x1000u) | (( gfp_t)0x200u) | (( gfp_t)0x400000u)), "GFP_TRANSHUGE"}, {(unsigned long)((((( gfp_t)0x10u) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u) | (( gfp_t)0x20000u)) | (( gfp_t)0x02u)) | (( gfp_t)0x08u)), "GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE"}, {(unsigned long)(((( gfp_t)0x10u) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u) | (( gfp_t)0x20000u)) | (( gfp_t)0x02u)), "GFP_HIGHUSER"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)0x10u) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u) | (( gfp_t)0x20000u)), "GFP_USER"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)0x10u) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u) | (( gfp_t)0x80000u)), "GFP_TEMPORARY"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)0x10u) | (( gfp_t)0x40u) | (( gfp_t)0x80u)), "GFP_KERNEL"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)0x10u) | (( gfp_t)0x40u)), "GFP_NOFS"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)0x20u)), "GFP_ATOMIC"}, {(unsigned long)((( gfp_t)0x10u)), "GFP_NOIO"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x20u), "GFP_HIGH"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x10u), "GFP_WAIT"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x40u), "GFP_IO"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x100u), "GFP_COLD"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x200u), "GFP_NOWARN"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x400u), "GFP_REPEAT"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x800u), "GFP_NOFAIL"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x1000u), "GFP_NORETRY"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x4000u), "GFP_COMP"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x8000u), "GFP_ZERO"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x10000u), "GFP_NOMEMALLOC"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x2000u), "GFP_MEMALLOC"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x20000u), "GFP_HARDWALL"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x40000u), "GFP_THISNODE"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x80000u), "GFP_RECLAIMABLE"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x08u), "GFP_MOVABLE"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x200000u), "GFP_NOTRACK"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x400000u), "GFP_NO_KSWAPD"}, {(unsigned long)(( gfp_t)0x800000u), "GFP_OTHER_NODE"} ) : "GFP_NOWAIT"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dean Nelson <dnelson@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 15:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] tools lib traceevent: add checks for returned EVENT_ERROR type |
| Message-ID | <pUPzj-lu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1202577 |
On 08/07/2015 05:59 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 01:08:05PM -0400, Dean Nelson wrote:
>> Running the following perf-stat command on an arm64 system produces the
>> following result...
>>
>> [root@aarch64 ~]# perf stat -e kmem:mm_page_alloc -a sleep 1
>> Warning: [kmem:mm_page_alloc] function sizeof not defined
>> Warning: Error: expected type 4 but read 0
>> Segmentation fault
>> [root@aarch64 ~]#
>
> hum, what kernel are you running on? I dont see that warning
The system is based on v4.2-rc3 and my .config has...
CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=y
which matters, as the sizeof operator is introduced through...
#define pfn_to_page __pfn_to_page
when __pfn_to_page is defined as...
#define __pfn_to_page(pfn) (vmemmap + (pfn))
which only happens when '#elif defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)' is
true.
Now vmemmap was redefined about a year ago by commit 08375198b01001c0e43b
to be...
#define VMEMMAP_SIZE ALIGN((1UL << (VA_BITS - PAGE_SHIFT))
* sizeof(struct page), PUD_SIZE)
#define VMALLOC_END (PAGE_OFFSET - PUD_SIZE -
VMEMMAP_SIZE - SZ_64K)
#define vmemmap ((struct page *)(VMALLOC_END + SZ_64K))
And VMEMMAP_SIZE has the sizeof operator. The ALIGN() macro introduces
a typeof operator which also would be an issue if the parser had gotten
that far.
This vmemmap stuff can be found in arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h.
Now backing up a step or two, the pfn_to_page() macro is referenced in
include/trace/events/kmem.h as the first of the 'args' passed to
TP_prink()...
TRACE_EVENT(mm_page_alloc,
:
TP_printk("page=%p pfn=%lu order=%d migratetype=%d gfp_flags=%s",
__entry->pfn != -1UL ? pfn_to_page(__entry->pfn) : NULL,
__entry->pfn != -1UL ? __entry->pfn : 0,
__entry->order,
__entry->migratetype,
show_gfp_flags(__entry->gfp_flags))
);
Hope that helps.
> on my system:
>
> [jolsa@krava perf]$ sudo ./perf stat -e kmem:mm_page_alloc -a sleep 1
>
> Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
>
> 227 kmem:mm_page_alloc
>
> 1.000762466 seconds time elapsed
>
> Cc-ing Namhyung
>
>
> jirka
>
>>
>> The second warning message and SIGSEGV stem from the issue expressed in the
>> first warning message, and are the result of ignoring the EVENT_ERROR type
>> returned back through the call chain.
>>
>> Dealing with the first warning message is beyond the scope of this patch. But
>> the second warning is addressed by this patch's first hunk. And the SIGSEGV is
>> eliminated by its second hunk.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <dnelson@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
>> index cc25f05..72e2933 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
>> @@ -1680,6 +1680,9 @@ process_cond(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg *top, char **tok)
>> type = process_arg(event, left, &token);
>>
>> again:
>> + if (type == EVENT_ERROR)
>> + goto out_free;
>> +
>> /* Handle other operations in the arguments */
>> if (type == EVENT_OP && strcmp(token, ":") != 0) {
>> type = process_op(event, left, &token);
>> @@ -1940,7 +1943,7 @@ process_op(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg *arg, char **tok)
>>
>> type = process_arg_token(event, right, tok, type);
>>
>> - if (right->type == PRINT_OP &&
>> + if (type != EVENT_ERROR && right->type == PRINT_OP &&
>> get_op_prio(arg->op.op) < get_op_prio(right->op.op)) {
>> struct print_arg tmp;
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 05:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pVpjr-1S7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1202577 |
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 12:59:10PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 01:08:05PM -0400, Dean Nelson wrote:
> > The second warning message and SIGSEGV stem from the issue expressed in the
> > first warning message, and are the result of ignoring the EVENT_ERROR type
> > returned back through the call chain.
> >
> > Dealing with the first warning message is beyond the scope of this patch. But
> > the second warning is addressed by this patch's first hunk. And the SIGSEGV is
> > eliminated by its second hunk.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <dnelson@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> > index cc25f05..72e2933 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> > @@ -1680,6 +1680,9 @@ process_cond(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg *top, char **tok)
> > type = process_arg(event, left, &token);
> >
> > again:
> > + if (type == EVENT_ERROR)
> > + goto out_free;
> > +
> > /* Handle other operations in the arguments */
> > if (type == EVENT_OP && strcmp(token, ":") != 0) {
> > type = process_op(event, left, &token);
> > @@ -1940,7 +1943,7 @@ process_op(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg *arg, char **tok)
> >
> > type = process_arg_token(event, right, tok, type);
> >
> > - if (right->type == PRINT_OP &&
> > + if (type != EVENT_ERROR && right->type == PRINT_OP &&
I think you'd better put the error check on separate lines. Other
than that look good to me.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> > get_op_prio(arg->op.op) < get_op_prio(right->op.op)) {
> > struct print_arg tmp;
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dean Nelson <dnelson@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 14:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] tools lib traceevent: add checks for returned EVENT_ERROR type |
| Message-ID | <pVUGB-6B0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1203568 |
On 08/08/2015 10:10 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 12:59:10PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 01:08:05PM -0400, Dean Nelson wrote:
>>> The second warning message and SIGSEGV stem from the issue expressed in the
>>> first warning message, and are the result of ignoring the EVENT_ERROR type
>>> returned back through the call chain.
>>>
>>> Dealing with the first warning message is beyond the scope of this patch. But
>>> the second warning is addressed by this patch's first hunk. And the SIGSEGV is
>>> eliminated by its second hunk.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <dnelson@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 5 ++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
>>> index cc25f05..72e2933 100644
>>> --- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
>>> +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
>>> @@ -1680,6 +1680,9 @@ process_cond(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg *top, char **tok)
>>> type = process_arg(event, left, &token);
>>>
>>> again:
>>> + if (type == EVENT_ERROR)
>>> + goto out_free;
>>> +
>>> /* Handle other operations in the arguments */
>>> if (type == EVENT_OP && strcmp(token, ":") != 0) {
>>> type = process_op(event, left, &token);
>>> @@ -1940,7 +1943,7 @@ process_op(struct event_format *event, struct print_arg *arg, char **tok)
>>>
>>> type = process_arg_token(event, right, tok, type);
>>>
>>> - if (right->type == PRINT_OP &&
>>> + if (type != EVENT_ERROR && right->type == PRINT_OP &&
>
> I think you'd better put the error check on separate lines. Other
> than that look good to me.
Okay. I've posted a v2. Consider v1 NAK'd.
And thank you Namhyung for reviewing this patch!
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>
>>> get_op_prio(arg->op.op) < get_op_prio(right->op.op)) {
>>> struct print_arg tmp;
>>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web