Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1200094 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-04 17:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-05 14:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add SPDIF support for rockchip Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-08-04 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add SPDIF support for rockchip Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-08-05 08:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add SPDIF support for rockchip Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-08-05 14:10 +0200
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 17:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add SPDIF support for rockchip |
| Message-ID | <pTMtS-6gT-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:18:15PM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > Sjoerd Simons (4): > ASoC: dt-bindings: add rockchip tranceiver bindings > ASoc: rockchip: Add rockchip SPDIF transceiver driver I only appear to have patch 2 (with the misspelt subject), not the binding documentation.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 08:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pU0Gu-1R0-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1200094 |
On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 16:36 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:18:15PM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > > > Sjoerd Simons (4): > > ASoC: dt-bindings: add rockchip tranceiver bindings > > ASoc: rockchip: Add rockchip SPDIF transceiver driver > > I only appear to have patch 2 (with the misspelt subject), not the > binding documentation. Applogies, Send that patch specifically to you now. Seems get_maintainers.pl didn't include you in the list (nor the other asoc maintainers in the list), I guess it might be good to add Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sounds/ to the ASoC file list in MAINTAINTERS ? -- Sjoerd Simons Collabora Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pU5G9-P2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1200455 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 08:42:01AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 16:36 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > I only appear to have patch 2 (with the misspelt subject), not the > > binding documentation. > Applogies, Send that patch specifically to you now. And I deleted it unread because it was just some random off list patch with no context. :( > Seems get_maintainers.pl didn't include you in the list (nor the other > asoc maintainers in the list), I guess it might be good to add > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sounds/ to the ASoC file list in > MAINTAINTERS ? Please follow the process covered in SubmittingPatches for making kernel changes, but note that there's generic sound drivers as well as ASoC ones. In general it is a very bad idea to rely on get_maintainers, it is prone to both false positives and missing relevant people. It can be useful to look at but you need to think about what it's telling you. In this case it should be fairly easy to tell that you ought to send the binding documentation along with the driver.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web