Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1200535 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH-v2 2/2] regulator: 88pm800: Add support for configuration of dual phase on BUCK1

Started byVaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
First post2015-08-05 10:50 +0200
Last post2015-08-05 10:50 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH-v2 2/2] regulator: 88pm800: Add support for configuration  of dual phase on BUCK1 Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> - 2015-08-05 10:50 +0200

#1200535 — Re: [PATCH-v2 2/2] regulator: 88pm800: Add support for configuration of dual phase on BUCK1

FromVaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
Date2015-08-05 10:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH-v2 2/2] regulator: 88pm800: Add support for configuration of dual phase on BUCK1
Message-ID<pU2yC-4zf-13@gated-at.bofh.it>

On Thursday 23 July 2015 09:24 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>
>> 88PM860 device supports dual phase mode on BUCK1 output.
>> In normal usecase, BUCK1A and BUCK1B operates independently with 3A
>> capacity. And they both can work as a dual phase providing 6A capacity.
>>
>> This patch updates the regulator driver to read the respective
>> DT property and enable dual-phase mode on BUCK1.
>>
>> Note that, this is init time (one time) initialization.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/regulator/88pm800.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/mfd/88pm80x.h |  3 +++
>>   2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/88pm80x.h b/include/linux/mfd/88pm80x.h
>> index a92d173..05d9bad 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mfd/88pm80x.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/88pm80x.h
>> @@ -295,6 +295,9 @@ enum {
>>   #define PM860_BUCK4_MISC2		(0x82)
>>   #define PM860_BUCK4_FULL_DRV		BIT(2)
>>
>> +#define PM860_BUCK1_MISC		(0x8E)
>
> Why the over-bracketing?
>

No specific reason, just wanted to be consistent with other definitions
in the file.

Anyway, will remove it in V3.

Thanks,
Vaibhav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web