Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1198871 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0/6] test_bpf improvements

Started byNicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
First post2015-08-03 16:10 +0200
Last post2015-08-03 16:50 +0200
Articles 13 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 0/6] test_bpf improvements Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> - 2015-08-03 16:10 +0200
    [PATCH 4/6] test_bpf: add module parameters to filter the tests to run. Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> - 2015-08-03 16:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 4/6] test_bpf: add module parameters to filter the tests  to run. Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2015-08-03 18:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 4/6] test_bpf: add module parameters to filter the tests  to run. Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2015-08-03 18:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 4/6] test_bpf: add module parameters to filter the tests  to run. Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> - 2015-08-03 18:40 +0200
    [PATCH 3/6] test_bpf: test LD_ABS and LD_IND instructions on fragmented skbs. Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> - 2015-08-03 16:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 3/6] test_bpf: test LD_ABS and LD_IND instructions on  fragmented skbs. Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2015-08-03 17:10 +0200
    [PATCH 6/6] test_bpf: add tests checking that JIT/interpreter sets A and X to 0. Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> - 2015-08-03 16:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 6/6] test_bpf: add tests checking that JIT/interpreter  sets A and X to 0. Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2015-08-03 17:10 +0200
    [PATCH 5/6] test_bpf: add more tests for LD_ABS and LD_IND. Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> - 2015-08-03 16:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 5/6] test_bpf: add more tests for LD_ABS and LD_IND. Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2015-08-03 17:10 +0200
    [PATCH 1/6] test_bpf: avoid oopsing the kernel when generate_test_data() fails. Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> - 2015-08-03 16:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/6] test_bpf: avoid oopsing the kernel when generate_test_data()  fails. Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2015-08-03 16:50 +0200

#1198871 — [PATCH 0/6] test_bpf improvements

FromNicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Date2015-08-03 16:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH 0/6] test_bpf improvements
Message-ID<pToBb-5iK-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hello,

Please find below the patch series with my latest changes to test_bpf.

The first patch checks for unexpected NULL generated skbs before
running the filter.

The second patch adds fhe possibility for tests to generate fragmented
skbs.

The third patch tests LD_ABS and LD_IND on fragmented skbs.

The fourth patch adds the possibility to restrict the tests being run
by specifying the name/id/range of the test(s) to run via module
parameters.

The fifth patch tests LD_ABS and LD_IND on non fragmented skbs with
various sizes and alignments.

The sixth and final patch checks that the interpreter or JIT correctly
resets A and X to 0.

This serie is against today's net-next tree.

Regards,

Nicolas Schichan (6):
  test_bpf: avoid oopsing the kernel when generate_test_data() fails.
  test_bpf: allow tests to specify an skb fragment.
  test_bpf: test LD_ABS and LD_IND instructions on fragmented skbs.
  test_bpf: allow running of a single test specified as a module
    parameter.
  test_bpf: add more tests for LD_ABS and LD_IND.
  test_bpf: add tests checking that JIT/interpreter sets A and X to 0.

 lib/test_bpf.c | 645 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 644 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1198874 — [PATCH 4/6] test_bpf: add module parameters to filter the tests to run.

FromNicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Date2015-08-03 16:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH 4/6] test_bpf: add module parameters to filter the tests to run.
Message-ID<pToBb-5iK-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1198871
When developping on the interpreter or a particular JIT, it can be
insteresting to restrict the test list to a specific test or a
particular range of tests.

This patch adds the following module parameters to the test_bpf module:

* test_name=<string>: only the specified named test will be run.

* test_id=<number>: only the test with the specified id will be run
  (see the output of test_pbf without parameters to get the test id).

* test_range=<number>,<number>: only the tests with IDs in the
  specified id range are run (see the output of test_pbf without
  parameters to get the test ids).

Any invalid range, test id or test name will result in -EINVAL being
returned and no tests being run.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
---
 lib/test_bpf.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index f5606fb..abd0507 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -4870,10 +4870,72 @@ static int run_one(const struct bpf_prog *fp, struct bpf_test *test)
 	return err_cnt;
 }
 
+static char test_name[64];
+module_param_string(test_name, test_name, sizeof(test_name), 0);
+
+static int test_id = -1;
+module_param(test_id, int, 0);
+
+static int test_range[2] = { -1, -1 };
+module_param_array(test_range, int, NULL, 0);
+
+static __init int find_test_index(const char *test_name)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
+		if (!strcmp(tests[i].descr, test_name))
+			return i;
+	}
+	return -1;
+}
+
 static __init int prepare_bpf_tests(void)
 {
 	int i;
 
+	if (test_id >= 0) {
+		/*
+		 * if a test_id was specified, use test_range to
+		 * conver only that test.
+		 */
+		if (test_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(tests)) {
+			pr_err("test_bpf: invalid test_id specified.\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		test_range[0] = test_id;
+		test_range[1] = test_id;
+	} else if (test_range[0] >= 0) {
+		/*
+		 * check that the supplied test_range is valid.
+		 */
+		if (test_range[0] >= ARRAY_SIZE(tests) ||
+		    test_range[1] >= ARRAY_SIZE(tests)) {
+			pr_err("test_bpf: test_range is out of bound.\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		if (test_range[1] < test_range[0]) {
+			pr_err("test_bpf: test_range is ending before it starts.\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	} else if (*test_name) {
+		/*
+		 * if a test_name was specified, find it and setup
+		 * test_range to cover only that test.
+		 */
+		int idx = find_test_index(test_name);
+
+		if (idx < 0) {
+			pr_err("test_bpf: no test named '%s' found.\n",
+			       test_name);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		test_range[0] = idx;
+		test_range[1] = idx;
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
 		if (tests[i].fill_helper &&
 		    tests[i].fill_helper(&tests[i]) < 0)
@@ -4893,6 +4955,14 @@ static __init void destroy_bpf_tests(void)
 	}
 }
 
+static bool exclude_test(int test_id)
+{
+	if (test_range[0] >= 0 &&
+	    (test_id < test_range[0] || test_id > test_range[1]))
+		return true;
+	return false;
+}
+
 static __init int test_bpf(void)
 {
 	int i, err_cnt = 0, pass_cnt = 0;
@@ -4902,6 +4972,9 @@ static __init int test_bpf(void)
 		struct bpf_prog *fp;
 		int err;
 
+		if (exclude_test(i))
+			continue;
+
 		pr_info("#%d %s ", i, tests[i].descr);
 
 		fp = generate_filter(i, &err);
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1198983 — Re: [PATCH 4/6] test_bpf: add module parameters to filter the tests to run.

FromDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date2015-08-03 18:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/6] test_bpf: add module parameters to filter the tests to run.
Message-ID<pTqjE-7A6-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1198874
On 08/03/2015 04:02 PM, Nicolas Schichan wrote:
> When developping on the interpreter or a particular JIT, it can be
> insteresting to restrict the test list to a specific test or a

s/insteresting/interesting/

> particular range of tests.
>
> This patch adds the following module parameters to the test_bpf module:
>
> * test_name=<string>: only the specified named test will be run.
>
> * test_id=<number>: only the test with the specified id will be run
>    (see the output of test_pbf without parameters to get the test id).

s/test_pbf/test_bpf/

> * test_range=<number>,<number>: only the tests with IDs in the
>    specified id range are run (see the output of test_pbf without

s/test_pbf/test_bpf/

>    parameters to get the test ids).
>
> Any invalid range, test id or test name will result in -EINVAL being
> returned and no tests being run.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>

Seems very useful for the test suite, thanks.

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

> ---
>   lib/test_bpf.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
> index f5606fb..abd0507 100644
> --- a/lib/test_bpf.c
> +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
> @@ -4870,10 +4870,72 @@ static int run_one(const struct bpf_prog *fp, struct bpf_test *test)
>   	return err_cnt;
>   }
>
> +static char test_name[64];
> +module_param_string(test_name, test_name, sizeof(test_name), 0);
> +
> +static int test_id = -1;
> +module_param(test_id, int, 0);
> +
> +static int test_range[2] = { -1, -1 };
> +module_param_array(test_range, int, NULL, 0);
> +
> +static __init int find_test_index(const char *test_name)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
> +		if (!strcmp(tests[i].descr, test_name))
> +			return i;
> +	}
> +	return -1;
> +}
> +
>   static __init int prepare_bpf_tests(void)
>   {
>   	int i;
>
> +	if (test_id >= 0) {
> +		/*
> +		 * if a test_id was specified, use test_range to
> +		 * conver only that test.

s/conver/cover/

> +		 */
> +		if (test_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(tests)) {
> +			pr_err("test_bpf: invalid test_id specified.\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
[...]
> @@ -4893,6 +4955,14 @@ static __init void destroy_bpf_tests(void)
>   	}
>   }
>
> +static bool exclude_test(int test_id)
> +{
> +	if (test_range[0] >= 0 &&
> +	    (test_id < test_range[0] || test_id > test_range[1]))
> +		return true;
> +	return false;

Minor nit: could directly return it, f.e.:

	return test_range[0] >= 0 && (test_id < test_range[0] ||
                                       test_id > test_range[1]);

Btw, for the range test in prepare_bpf_tests(), you could also reject
a negative lower bound index right there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1199029 — Re: [PATCH 4/6] test_bpf: add module parameters to filter the tests to run.

FromDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date2015-08-03 18:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/6] test_bpf: add module parameters to filter the tests to run.
Message-ID<pTqWm-7p-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1198983
On 08/03/2015 06:23 PM, Nicolas Schichan wrote:
...
>> Btw, for the range test in prepare_bpf_tests(), you could also reject
>> a negative lower bound index right there.
>
> I thought it was better to have all the sanity checks grouped in
> prepare_bpf_tests() (with the checking of the test_name and test_id parameters
> nearby) ? Also a negative lower bound is meaning that no range has been set so
> all tests should be run.

I just got a bit confused when loading test_range=-100,1 was not rejected, but
they do indeed all run in this case.

Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1199031 — Re: [PATCH 4/6] test_bpf: add module parameters to filter the tests to run.

FromNicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Date2015-08-03 18:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/6] test_bpf: add module parameters to filter the tests to run.
Message-ID<pTqWm-7p-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1198983
On 08/03/2015 05:58 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 08/03/2015 04:02 PM, Nicolas Schichan wrote:
>> When developping on the interpreter or a particular JIT, it can be
>> insteresting to restrict the test list to a specific test or a
> 
> s/insteresting/interesting/
[...]
> s/test_pbf/test_bpf/
[...]
> s/test_pbf/test_bpf/
[...]
> s/conver/cover/

Sorry for the various typos, I'll fix that in a V2.

>> +         */
>> +        if (test_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(tests)) {
>> +            pr_err("test_bpf: invalid test_id specified.\n");
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +        }
> [...]
>> @@ -4893,6 +4955,14 @@ static __init void destroy_bpf_tests(void)
>>       }
>>   }
>>
>> +static bool exclude_test(int test_id)
>> +{
>> +    if (test_range[0] >= 0 &&
>> +        (test_id < test_range[0] || test_id > test_range[1]))
>> +        return true;
>> +    return false;
> 
> Minor nit: could directly return it, f.e.:
> 
>     return test_range[0] >= 0 && (test_id < test_range[0] ||
>                                       test_id > test_range[1]);

I will change that.

> Btw, for the range test in prepare_bpf_tests(), you could also reject
> a negative lower bound index right there.

I thought it was better to have all the sanity checks grouped in
prepare_bpf_tests() (with the checking of the test_name and test_id parameters
nearby) ? Also a negative lower bound is meaning that no range has been set so
all tests should be run.

Thanks,

-- 
Nicolas Schichan
Freebox SAS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1198875 — [PATCH 3/6] test_bpf: test LD_ABS and LD_IND instructions on fragmented skbs.

FromNicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Date2015-08-03 16:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH 3/6] test_bpf: test LD_ABS and LD_IND instructions on fragmented skbs.
Message-ID<pToBc-5iK-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1198871
These new tests exercise various load sizes and offsets crossing the
head/fragment boundary.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
---
 lib/test_bpf.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 142 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index acef1e9..f5606fb 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -4493,6 +4493,148 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		{ { 1, 0xbef } },
 		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_ld_abs_vlan_push_pop,
 	},
+	/*
+	 * LD_IND / LD_ABS on fragmented SKBs
+	 */
+	{
+		"LD_IND byte frag",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_IMM, 0x40),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_B, 0x0),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_SKB_FRAG,
+		{ },
+		{ {0x40, 0x42} },
+		.frag_data = {
+			0x42, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
+			0x43, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00,
+			0x21, 0x07, 0x19, 0x83,
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_IND halfword frag",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_IMM, 0x40),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_H, 0x4),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_SKB_FRAG,
+		{ },
+		{ {0x40, 0x4344} },
+		.frag_data = {
+			0x42, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
+			0x43, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00,
+			0x21, 0x07, 0x19, 0x83,
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_IND word frag",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_IMM, 0x40),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_W, 0x8),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_SKB_FRAG,
+		{ },
+		{ {0x40, 0x21071983} },
+		.frag_data = {
+			0x42, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
+			0x43, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00,
+			0x21, 0x07, 0x19, 0x83,
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_IND halfword mixed head/frag",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_IMM, 0x40),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_H, -0x1),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_SKB_FRAG,
+		{ [0x3e] = 0x25, [0x3f] = 0x05, },
+		{ {0x40, 0x0519} },
+		.frag_data = { 0x19, 0x82 },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_IND word mixed head/frag",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_IMM, 0x40),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_W, -0x2),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_SKB_FRAG,
+		{ [0x3e] = 0x25, [0x3f] = 0x05, },
+		{ {0x40, 0x25051982} },
+		.frag_data = { 0x19, 0x82 },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_ABS byte frag",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_B, 0x40),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_SKB_FRAG,
+		{ },
+		{ {0x40, 0x42} },
+		.frag_data = {
+			0x42, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
+			0x43, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00,
+			0x21, 0x07, 0x19, 0x83,
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_ABS halfword frag",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_H, 0x44),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_SKB_FRAG,
+		{ },
+		{ {0x40, 0x4344} },
+		.frag_data = {
+			0x42, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
+			0x43, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00,
+			0x21, 0x07, 0x19, 0x83,
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_ABS word frag",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_W, 0x48),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_SKB_FRAG,
+		{ },
+		{ {0x40, 0x21071983} },
+		.frag_data = {
+			0x42, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
+			0x43, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00,
+			0x21, 0x07, 0x19, 0x83,
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_ABS halfword mixed head/frag",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_H, 0x3f),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_SKB_FRAG,
+		{ [0x3e] = 0x25, [0x3f] = 0x05, },
+		{ {0x40, 0x0519} },
+		.frag_data = { 0x19, 0x82 },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_ABS word mixed head/frag",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_W, 0x3e),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_SKB_FRAG,
+		{ [0x3e] = 0x25, [0x3f] = 0x05, },
+		{ {0x40, 0x25051982} },
+		.frag_data = { 0x19, 0x82 },
+	},
 };
 
 static struct net_device dev;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1198924 — Re: [PATCH 3/6] test_bpf: test LD_ABS and LD_IND instructions on fragmented skbs.

FromDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date2015-08-03 17:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/6] test_bpf: test LD_ABS and LD_IND instructions on fragmented skbs.
Message-ID<pTpxf-6Ex-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1198875
On 08/03/2015 04:02 PM, Nicolas Schichan wrote:
> These new tests exercise various load sizes and offsets crossing the
> head/fragment boundary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1198880 — [PATCH 6/6] test_bpf: add tests checking that JIT/interpreter sets A and X to 0.

FromNicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Date2015-08-03 16:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH 6/6] test_bpf: add tests checking that JIT/interpreter sets A and X to 0.
Message-ID<pToBc-5iK-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1198871
It is mandatory for the JIT or interpreter to reset the A and X
registers to 0 before running the filter. Check that it is the case on
various ALU and JMP instructions.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
---
 lib/test_bpf.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 158 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index a84a875..51f94f9 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -4931,6 +4931,164 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		},
 		{ {0x40, 0x88ee99ff } },
 	},
+	/*
+	 * verify that the interpreter or JIT correctly sets A and X
+	 * to 0.
+	 */
+	{
+		"ADD default X",
+		.u.insns = {
+			/*
+			 * A = 0x42
+			 * A = A + X
+			 * ret A
+			 */
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM, 0x42),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_ALU | BPF_ADD | BPF_X, 0),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{},
+		{ {0x1, 0x42 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"ADD default A",
+		.u.insns = {
+			/*
+			 * A = A + 0x42
+			 * ret A
+			 */
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_ALU | BPF_ADD | BPF_K, 0x42),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{},
+		{ {0x1, 0x42 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"SUB default X",
+		.u.insns = {
+			/*
+			 * A = 0x66
+			 * A = A - X
+			 * ret A
+			 */
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM, 0x66),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_X, 0),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{},
+		{ {0x1, 0x66 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"SUB default A",
+		.u.insns = {
+			/*
+			 * A = A - -0x66
+			 * ret A
+			 */
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_K, -0x66),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{},
+		{ {0x1, 0x66 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"MUL default X",
+		.u.insns = {
+			/*
+			 * A = 0x42
+			 * A = A * X
+			 * ret A
+			 */
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM, 0x42),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_X, 0),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{},
+		{ {0x1, 0x0 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"MUL default A",
+		.u.insns = {
+			/*
+			 * A = A * 0x66
+			 * ret A
+			 */
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_K, 0x66),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{},
+		{ {0x1, 0x0 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV default X",
+		.u.insns = {
+			/*
+			 * A = 0x42
+			 * A = A / X ; this halt the filter execution if X is 0
+			 * ret 0x42
+			 */
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM, 0x42),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X, 0),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, 0x42),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{},
+		{ {0x1, 0x0 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV default A",
+		.u.insns = {
+			/*
+			 * A = A / 1
+			 * ret A
+			 */
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_K, 0x1),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{},
+		{ {0x1, 0x0 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"JMP EQ default A",
+		.u.insns = {
+			/*
+			 * cmp A, 0x0, 0, 1
+			 * ret 0x42
+			 * ret 0x66
+			 */
+			BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_K, 0x0, 0, 1),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, 0x42),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, 0x66),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{},
+		{ {0x1, 0x42 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"JMP EQ default X",
+		.u.insns = {
+			/*
+			 * A = 0x0
+			 * cmp A, X, 0, 1
+			 * ret 0x42
+			 * ret 0x66
+			 */
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM, 0x0),
+			BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_X, 0x0, 0, 1),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, 0x42),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, 0x66),
+		},
+		CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+		{},
+		{ {0x1, 0x42 } },
+	},
 };
 
 static struct net_device dev;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1198925 — Re: [PATCH 6/6] test_bpf: add tests checking that JIT/interpreter sets A and X to 0.

FromDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date2015-08-03 17:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/6] test_bpf: add tests checking that JIT/interpreter sets A and X to 0.
Message-ID<pTpxf-6Ex-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1198880
On 08/03/2015 04:02 PM, Nicolas Schichan wrote:
> It is mandatory for the JIT or interpreter to reset the A and X
> registers to 0 before running the filter. Check that it is the case on
> various ALU and JMP instructions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1198881 — [PATCH 5/6] test_bpf: add more tests for LD_ABS and LD_IND.

FromNicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Date2015-08-03 16:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH 5/6] test_bpf: add more tests for LD_ABS and LD_IND.
Message-ID<pToBc-5iK-47@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1198871
This exerces the LD_ABS and LD_IND instructions for various sizes and
alignments. This also checks that X when used as an offset to a
BPF_IND instruction first in a filter is correctly set to 0.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
---
 lib/test_bpf.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 296 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index abd0507..a84a875 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -4635,6 +4635,302 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		{ {0x40, 0x25051982} },
 		.frag_data = { 0x19, 0x82 },
 	},
+	/*
+	 * LD_IND / LD_ABS on non fragmented SKBs
+	 */
+	{
+		/*
+		 * this tests that the JIT/interpreter correctly resets X
+		 * before using it in an LD_IND instruction.
+		 */
+		"LD_IND byte default X",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_B, 0x1),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{ [0x1] = 0x42 },
+		{ {0x40, 0x42 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_IND byte positive offset",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_IMM, 0x3e),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_B, 0x1),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{ [0x3c] = 0x25, [0x3d] = 0x05,  [0x3e] = 0x19, [0x3f] = 0x82 },
+		{ {0x40, 0x82 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_IND byte negative offset",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_IMM, 0x3e),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_B, -0x1),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{ [0x3c] = 0x25, [0x3d] = 0x05,  [0x3e] = 0x19, [0x3f] = 0x82 },
+		{ {0x40, 0x05 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_IND halfword positive offset",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_IMM, 0x20),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_H, 0x2),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{
+			[0x1c] = 0xaa, [0x1d] = 0x55,
+			[0x1e] = 0xbb, [0x1f] = 0x66,
+			[0x20] = 0xcc, [0x21] = 0x77,
+			[0x22] = 0xdd, [0x23] = 0x88,
+		},
+		{ {0x40, 0xdd88 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_IND halfword negative offset",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_IMM, 0x20),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_H, -0x2),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{
+			[0x1c] = 0xaa, [0x1d] = 0x55,
+			[0x1e] = 0xbb, [0x1f] = 0x66,
+			[0x20] = 0xcc, [0x21] = 0x77,
+			[0x22] = 0xdd, [0x23] = 0x88,
+		},
+		{ {0x40, 0xbb66 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_IND halfword unaligned",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_IMM, 0x20),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_H, -0x1),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{
+			[0x1c] = 0xaa, [0x1d] = 0x55,
+			[0x1e] = 0xbb, [0x1f] = 0x66,
+			[0x20] = 0xcc, [0x21] = 0x77,
+			[0x22] = 0xdd, [0x23] = 0x88,
+		},
+		{ {0x40, 0x66cc } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_IND word positive offset",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_IMM, 0x20),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_W, 0x4),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{
+			[0x1c] = 0xaa, [0x1d] = 0x55,
+			[0x1e] = 0xbb, [0x1f] = 0x66,
+			[0x20] = 0xcc, [0x21] = 0x77,
+			[0x22] = 0xdd, [0x23] = 0x88,
+			[0x24] = 0xee, [0x25] = 0x99,
+			[0x26] = 0xff, [0x27] = 0xaa,
+		},
+		{ {0x40, 0xee99ffaa } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_IND word negative offset",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_IMM, 0x20),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_W, -0x4),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{
+			[0x1c] = 0xaa, [0x1d] = 0x55,
+			[0x1e] = 0xbb, [0x1f] = 0x66,
+			[0x20] = 0xcc, [0x21] = 0x77,
+			[0x22] = 0xdd, [0x23] = 0x88,
+			[0x24] = 0xee, [0x25] = 0x99,
+			[0x26] = 0xff, [0x27] = 0xaa,
+		},
+		{ {0x40, 0xaa55bb66 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_IND word unaligned (addr & 3 == 2)",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_IMM, 0x20),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_W, -0x2),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{
+			[0x1c] = 0xaa, [0x1d] = 0x55,
+			[0x1e] = 0xbb, [0x1f] = 0x66,
+			[0x20] = 0xcc, [0x21] = 0x77,
+			[0x22] = 0xdd, [0x23] = 0x88,
+			[0x24] = 0xee, [0x25] = 0x99,
+			[0x26] = 0xff, [0x27] = 0xaa,
+		},
+		{ {0x40, 0xbb66cc77 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_IND word unaligned (addr & 3 == 1)",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_IMM, 0x20),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_W, -0x3),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{
+			[0x1c] = 0xaa, [0x1d] = 0x55,
+			[0x1e] = 0xbb, [0x1f] = 0x66,
+			[0x20] = 0xcc, [0x21] = 0x77,
+			[0x22] = 0xdd, [0x23] = 0x88,
+			[0x24] = 0xee, [0x25] = 0x99,
+			[0x26] = 0xff, [0x27] = 0xaa,
+		},
+		{ {0x40, 0x55bb66cc } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_IND word unaligned (addr & 3 == 3)",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LDX | BPF_IMM, 0x20),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_W, -0x1),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{
+			[0x1c] = 0xaa, [0x1d] = 0x55,
+			[0x1e] = 0xbb, [0x1f] = 0x66,
+			[0x20] = 0xcc, [0x21] = 0x77,
+			[0x22] = 0xdd, [0x23] = 0x88,
+			[0x24] = 0xee, [0x25] = 0x99,
+			[0x26] = 0xff, [0x27] = 0xaa,
+		},
+		{ {0x40, 0x66cc77dd } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_ABS byte",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_B, 0x20),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{
+			[0x1c] = 0xaa, [0x1d] = 0x55,
+			[0x1e] = 0xbb, [0x1f] = 0x66,
+			[0x20] = 0xcc, [0x21] = 0x77,
+			[0x22] = 0xdd, [0x23] = 0x88,
+			[0x24] = 0xee, [0x25] = 0x99,
+			[0x26] = 0xff, [0x27] = 0xaa,
+		},
+		{ {0x40, 0xcc } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_ABS halfword",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_H, 0x22),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{
+			[0x1c] = 0xaa, [0x1d] = 0x55,
+			[0x1e] = 0xbb, [0x1f] = 0x66,
+			[0x20] = 0xcc, [0x21] = 0x77,
+			[0x22] = 0xdd, [0x23] = 0x88,
+			[0x24] = 0xee, [0x25] = 0x99,
+			[0x26] = 0xff, [0x27] = 0xaa,
+		},
+		{ {0x40, 0xdd88 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_ABS halfword unaligned",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_H, 0x25),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{
+			[0x1c] = 0xaa, [0x1d] = 0x55,
+			[0x1e] = 0xbb, [0x1f] = 0x66,
+			[0x20] = 0xcc, [0x21] = 0x77,
+			[0x22] = 0xdd, [0x23] = 0x88,
+			[0x24] = 0xee, [0x25] = 0x99,
+			[0x26] = 0xff, [0x27] = 0xaa,
+		},
+		{ {0x40, 0x99ff } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_ABS word",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_W, 0x1c),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{
+			[0x1c] = 0xaa, [0x1d] = 0x55,
+			[0x1e] = 0xbb, [0x1f] = 0x66,
+			[0x20] = 0xcc, [0x21] = 0x77,
+			[0x22] = 0xdd, [0x23] = 0x88,
+			[0x24] = 0xee, [0x25] = 0x99,
+			[0x26] = 0xff, [0x27] = 0xaa,
+		},
+		{ {0x40, 0xaa55bb66 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_ABS word unaligned (addr & 3 == 2)",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_W, 0x22),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{
+			[0x1c] = 0xaa, [0x1d] = 0x55,
+			[0x1e] = 0xbb, [0x1f] = 0x66,
+			[0x20] = 0xcc, [0x21] = 0x77,
+			[0x22] = 0xdd, [0x23] = 0x88,
+			[0x24] = 0xee, [0x25] = 0x99,
+			[0x26] = 0xff, [0x27] = 0xaa,
+		},
+		{ {0x40, 0xdd88ee99 } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_ABS word unaligned (addr & 3 == 1)",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_W, 0x21),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{
+			[0x1c] = 0xaa, [0x1d] = 0x55,
+			[0x1e] = 0xbb, [0x1f] = 0x66,
+			[0x20] = 0xcc, [0x21] = 0x77,
+			[0x22] = 0xdd, [0x23] = 0x88,
+			[0x24] = 0xee, [0x25] = 0x99,
+			[0x26] = 0xff, [0x27] = 0xaa,
+		},
+		{ {0x40, 0x77dd88ee } },
+	},
+	{
+		"LD_ABS word unaligned (addr & 3 == 3)",
+		.u.insns = {
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_W, 0x23),
+			BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+		},
+		CLASSIC,
+		{
+			[0x1c] = 0xaa, [0x1d] = 0x55,
+			[0x1e] = 0xbb, [0x1f] = 0x66,
+			[0x20] = 0xcc, [0x21] = 0x77,
+			[0x22] = 0xdd, [0x23] = 0x88,
+			[0x24] = 0xee, [0x25] = 0x99,
+			[0x26] = 0xff, [0x27] = 0xaa,
+		},
+		{ {0x40, 0x88ee99ff } },
+	},
 };
 
 static struct net_device dev;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1198926 — Re: [PATCH 5/6] test_bpf: add more tests for LD_ABS and LD_IND.

FromDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date2015-08-03 17:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/6] test_bpf: add more tests for LD_ABS and LD_IND.
Message-ID<pTpxg-6Ex-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1198881
On 08/03/2015 04:02 PM, Nicolas Schichan wrote:
> This exerces the LD_ABS and LD_IND instructions for various sizes and
> alignments. This also checks that X when used as an offset to a
> BPF_IND instruction first in a filter is correctly set to 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1198882 — [PATCH 1/6] test_bpf: avoid oopsing the kernel when generate_test_data() fails.

FromNicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Date2015-08-03 16:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH 1/6] test_bpf: avoid oopsing the kernel when generate_test_data() fails.
Message-ID<pToBd-5iK-53@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1198871
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
---
 lib/test_bpf.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index 3afddf2..6843d0b 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -4672,6 +4672,11 @@ static int run_one(const struct bpf_prog *fp, struct bpf_test *test)
 			break;
 
 		data = generate_test_data(test, i);
+		if (!data && !(test->aux & FLAG_NO_DATA)) {
+			pr_cont("data generation failed ");
+			err_cnt++;
+			break;
+		}
 		ret = __run_one(fp, data, runs, &duration);
 		release_test_data(test, data);
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1198911 — Re: [PATCH 1/6] test_bpf: avoid oopsing the kernel when generate_test_data() fails.

FromDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date2015-08-03 16:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6] test_bpf: avoid oopsing the kernel when generate_test_data() fails.
Message-ID<pTpdU-62e-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1198882
On 08/03/2015 04:02 PM, Nicolas Schichan wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web