Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1199590 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] scripts/kernel-doc Allow struct arguments documentation in struct body

Started byDaniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
First post2015-08-04 11:10 +0200
Last post2015-08-06 21:20 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] scripts/kernel-doc Allow struct arguments documentation  in struct body Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> - 2015-08-04 11:10 +0200
    [PATCH v2] scripts/kernel-doc Allow struct arguments documentation in struct body Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula <danilo.cesar@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-08-04 14:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2] scripts/kernel-doc Allow struct arguments  documentation in struct body Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2015-08-06 21:20 +0200

#1199590 — Re: [PATCH] scripts/kernel-doc Allow struct arguments documentation in struct body

FromDaniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Date2015-08-04 11:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] scripts/kernel-doc Allow struct arguments documentation in struct body
Message-ID<pTGor-60Z-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 06:06:45PM -0300, Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula wrote:
> Describing arguments at top of a struct definition works fine
> for small/medium size structs, but it definitely doesn't work well
> for struct with a huge list of elements.
> 
> Keeping the arguments list inside the struct body makes it easier
> to maintain the documentation.
> ie:
> /**
>  * struct my_struct - short description
>  * @a: first member
>  * @b: second member
>  *
>  * Longer description
>  */
> struct my_struct {
>     int a;
>     int b;
>     /**
>      * @c: This is longer description of C
>      *
>      * You can use paragraphs to describe arguments
>      * using this method.
>      */
>     int c;
> };
> 
> This patch allows the use of this kind of syntax. Only one argument
> per comment and user can use how many paragraphs he needs. It should
> start with /**, which is already being used by kernel-doc. If those
> comment doesn't follow those rules, it will be ignored.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula <danilo.cesar@collabora.co.uk>
> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> Cc: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
> Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
> ---
>  scripts/kernel-doc | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/kernel-doc b/scripts/kernel-doc
> index 9922e66..9bfa8b9 100755
> --- a/scripts/kernel-doc
> +++ b/scripts/kernel-doc
> @@ -133,6 +133,30 @@ use strict;
>  #
>  # All descriptions can be multiline, except the short function description.
>  #
> +# For really longs structs, you can also describe arguments inside the
> +# body of the struct.
> +# eg.
> +# /**
> +#  * struct my_struct - short description
> +#  * @a: first member
> +#  * @b: second member
> +#  *
> +#  * Longer description
> +#  */
> +# struct my_struct {
> +#     int a;
> +#     int b;
> +#     /**
> +#      * @c: This is longer description of C
> +#      *
> +#      * You can use paragraphs to describe arguments
> +#      * using this method.
> +#      */
> +#     int c;
> +# };
> +#
> +# This should be use for arguments only.
> +#
>  # You can also add additional sections. When documenting kernel functions you
>  # should document the "Context:" of the function, e.g. whether the functions
>  # can be called form interrupts. Unlike other sections you can end it with an
> @@ -287,9 +311,19 @@ my $lineprefix="";
>  # 2 - scanning field start.
>  # 3 - scanning prototype.
>  # 4 - documentation block
> +# 5 - gathering documentation outside main block
>  my $state;
>  my $in_doc_sect;
>  
> +# Split Doc State
> +# 0 - Invalid (Before start or after finish)
> +# 1 - Is started (the /** was found inside a struct)
> +# 2 - The @parameter header was found, start accepting multi paragraph text.
> +# 3 - Finished (the */ was found)
> +# 4 - Error - Comment without header was found. Spit a warning as it's not
> +#     proper kernel-doc and ignore the rest.
> +my $split_doc_state;
> +
>  #declaration types: can be
>  # 'function', 'struct', 'union', 'enum', 'typedef'
>  my $decl_type;
> @@ -304,6 +338,9 @@ my $doc_decl = $doc_com . '(\w+)';
>  my $doc_sect = $doc_com . '([' . $doc_special . ']?[\w\s]+):(.*)';
>  my $doc_content = $doc_com_body . '(.*)';
>  my $doc_block = $doc_com . 'DOC:\s*(.*)?';
> +my $doc_split_start = '^\s*/\*\*\s*$';
> +my $doc_split_sect = '\s*\*\s*(@[\w\s]+):(.*)';
> +my $doc_split_end = '^\s*\*/\s*$';
>  
>  my %constants;
>  my %parameterdescs;
> @@ -2181,6 +2218,7 @@ sub reset_state {
>      $prototype = "";
>  
>      $state = 0;
> +    $split_doc_state = 0;
>  }
>  
>  sub tracepoint_munge($) {
> @@ -2453,7 +2491,6 @@ sub process_file($) {
>  		}
>  		$section = $newsection;
>  	    } elsif (/$doc_end/) {
> -
>  		if (($contents ne "") && ($contents ne "\n")) {
>  		    dump_section($file, $section, xml_escape($contents));
>  		    $section = $section_default;
> @@ -2494,8 +2531,47 @@ sub process_file($) {
>  		print STDERR "Warning(${file}:$.): bad line: $_";
>  		++$warnings;
>  	    }
> +	} elsif ($state == 5) { # scanning for split parameters
> +
> +	    # First line (state 1) needs to be a @parameter
> +	    if ($split_doc_state == 1 && /$doc_split_sect/o) {
> +	        $section = $1;
> +	        $contents = $2;

You're using a mix of tabs and spaces here to indent. Ofc we need 4 spaces
for odd indent levels, but for others it shouldn't be required.
-Daniel

> +	        if ($contents ne "") {
> +	    	    while ((substr($contents, 0, 1) eq " ") ||
> +	                    substr($contents, 0, 1) eq "\t") {
> +	    	        $contents = substr($contents, 1);
> +	            }
> +	            $contents .= "\n";
> +	        }
> +	        $split_doc_state = 2;
> +
> +	    # End commend */
> +	    } elsif (/$doc_split_end/) {
> +	        if (($contents ne "") && ($contents ne "\n")) {
> +	            dump_section($file, $section, xml_escape($contents));
> +	            $section = $section_default;
> +	            $contents = "";
> +	        }
> +	        $state = 3;
> +	        $split_doc_state = 0;
> +
> +	    # Regular text
> +	    } elsif (/$doc_content/) {
> +	    	if ($split_doc_state == 2) {
> +	    	    $contents .= $1 . "\n";
> +	    	} elsif ($split_doc_state == 1) {
> +	    	    $split_doc_state = 4;
> +	    	    print STDERR "Warning(${file}:$.): ";
> +	    	    print STDERR "Incorrect use of kernel-doc format: $_";
> +	    	    ++$warnings;
> +	    	}
> +	    }
>  	} elsif ($state == 3) {	# scanning for function '{' (end of prototype)
> -	    if ($decl_type eq 'function') {
> +	    if (/$doc_split_start/) {
> +	    	    $state = 5;
> +	    	    $split_doc_state = 1;
> +	    } elsif ($decl_type eq 'function') {
>  		process_state3_function($_, $file);
>  	    } else {
>  		process_state3_type($_, $file);
> -- 
> 2.4.6
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1199742 — [PATCH v2] scripts/kernel-doc Allow struct arguments documentation in struct body

FromDanilo Cesar Lemes de Paula <danilo.cesar@collabora.co.uk>
Date2015-08-04 14:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH v2] scripts/kernel-doc Allow struct arguments documentation in struct body
Message-ID<pTJcF-1D3-71@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1199590
Describing arguments at top of a struct definition works fine
for small/medium size structs, but it definitely doesn't work well
for struct with a huge list of elements.

Keeping the arguments list inside the struct body makes it easier
to maintain the documentation.
ie:
/**
 * struct my_struct - short description
 * @a: first member
 * @b: second member
 *
 * Longer description
 */
struct my_struct {
    int a;
    int b;
    /**
     * @c: This is longer description of C
     *
     * You can use paragraphs to describe arguments
     * using this method.
     */
    int c;
};

This patch allows the use of this kind of syntax. Only one argument
per comment and user can use how many paragraphs he needs. It should
start with /**, which is already being used by kernel-doc. If those
comment doesn't follow those rules, it will be ignored.

Signed-off-by: Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula <danilo.cesar@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
---
 Changelog:
  v2:
     - Fixed comment typo
     - Fixed identantion by following the rest of the kernel-doc script pattern.
     - Improved usage comment.

 scripts/kernel-doc | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/kernel-doc b/scripts/kernel-doc
index 9922e66..5adc7ee 100755
--- a/scripts/kernel-doc
+++ b/scripts/kernel-doc
@@ -133,6 +133,30 @@ use strict;
 #
 # All descriptions can be multiline, except the short function description.
 #
+# For really longs structs, you can also describe arguments inside the
+# body of the struct.
+# eg.
+# /**
+#  * struct my_struct - short description
+#  * @a: first member
+#  * @b: second member
+#  *
+#  * Longer description
+#  */
+# struct my_struct {
+#     int a;
+#     int b;
+#     /**
+#      * @c: This is longer description of C
+#      *
+#      * You can use paragraphs to describe arguments
+#      * using this method.
+#      */
+#     int c;
+# };
+#
+# This should be use only for struct/enum members.
+#
 # You can also add additional sections. When documenting kernel functions you
 # should document the "Context:" of the function, e.g. whether the functions
 # can be called form interrupts. Unlike other sections you can end it with an
@@ -287,9 +311,19 @@ my $lineprefix="";
 # 2 - scanning field start.
 # 3 - scanning prototype.
 # 4 - documentation block
+# 5 - gathering documentation outside main block
 my $state;
 my $in_doc_sect;
 
+# Split Doc State
+# 0 - Invalid (Before start or after finish)
+# 1 - Is started (the /** was found inside a struct)
+# 2 - The @parameter header was found, start accepting multi paragraph text.
+# 3 - Finished (the */ was found)
+# 4 - Error - Comment without header was found. Spit a warning as it's not
+#     proper kernel-doc and ignore the rest.
+my $split_doc_state;
+
 #declaration types: can be
 # 'function', 'struct', 'union', 'enum', 'typedef'
 my $decl_type;
@@ -304,6 +338,9 @@ my $doc_decl = $doc_com . '(\w+)';
 my $doc_sect = $doc_com . '([' . $doc_special . ']?[\w\s]+):(.*)';
 my $doc_content = $doc_com_body . '(.*)';
 my $doc_block = $doc_com . 'DOC:\s*(.*)?';
+my $doc_split_start = '^\s*/\*\*\s*$';
+my $doc_split_sect = '\s*\*\s*(@[\w\s]+):(.*)';
+my $doc_split_end = '^\s*\*/\s*$';
 
 my %constants;
 my %parameterdescs;
@@ -2181,6 +2218,7 @@ sub reset_state {
     $prototype = "";
 
     $state = 0;
+    $split_doc_state = 0;
 }
 
 sub tracepoint_munge($) {
@@ -2453,7 +2491,6 @@ sub process_file($) {
 		}
 		$section = $newsection;
 	    } elsif (/$doc_end/) {
-
 		if (($contents ne "") && ($contents ne "\n")) {
 		    dump_section($file, $section, xml_escape($contents));
 		    $section = $section_default;
@@ -2494,8 +2531,44 @@ sub process_file($) {
 		print STDERR "Warning(${file}:$.): bad line: $_";
 		++$warnings;
 	    }
+	} elsif ($state == 5) { # scanning for split parameters
+	    # First line (state 1) needs to be a @parameter
+	    if ($split_doc_state == 1 && /$doc_split_sect/o) {
+		$section = $1;
+		$contents = $2;
+		if ($contents ne "") {
+		    while ((substr($contents, 0, 1) eq " ") ||
+		           substr($contents, 0, 1) eq "\t") {
+			$contents = substr($contents, 1);
+		    }
+		$contents .= "\n";
+		}
+		$split_doc_state = 2;
+	    # Documentation block end */
+	    } elsif (/$doc_split_end/) {
+		if (($contents ne "") && ($contents ne "\n")) {
+		    dump_section($file, $section, xml_escape($contents));
+		    $section = $section_default;
+		    $contents = "";
+		}
+		$state = 3;
+		$split_doc_state = 0;
+	    # Regular text
+	    } elsif (/$doc_content/) {
+		if ($split_doc_state == 2) {
+		    $contents .= $1 . "\n";
+		} elsif ($split_doc_state == 1) {
+		    $split_doc_state = 4;
+		    print STDERR "Warning(${file}:$.): ";
+		    print STDERR "Incorrect use of kernel-doc format: $_";
+		    ++$warnings;
+		}
+	    }
 	} elsif ($state == 3) {	# scanning for function '{' (end of prototype)
-	    if ($decl_type eq 'function') {
+	    if (/$doc_split_start/) {
+		$state = 5;
+		$split_doc_state = 1;
+	    } elsif ($decl_type eq 'function') {
 		process_state3_function($_, $file);
 	    } else {
 		process_state3_type($_, $file);
-- 
2.4.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1201981 — Re: [PATCH v2] scripts/kernel-doc Allow struct arguments documentation in struct body

FromJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Date2015-08-06 21:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] scripts/kernel-doc Allow struct arguments documentation in struct body
Message-ID<pUyRP-1mX-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1199742
On Tue,  4 Aug 2015 09:04:08 -0300
Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula <danilo.cesar@collabora.co.uk> wrote:

> Describing arguments at top of a struct definition works fine
> for small/medium size structs, but it definitely doesn't work well
> for struct with a huge list of elements.
> 
> Keeping the arguments list inside the struct body makes it easier
> to maintain the documentation.

OK, this change has been merged into the docs tree.

Thanks,

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web