Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1198382 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/3] clocksource: atmel-st: Remove irq handler when clock event is unused

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/3] clocksource: atmel-st: Remove irq handler when clock  event is unused Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-08-02 11:20 +0200

#1198382 — Re: [PATCH 1/3] clocksource: atmel-st: Remove irq handler when clock event is unused

On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> 
> > On 20/07/2015 at 11:04:30 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote :
> > > That's why I used setup/remove_irq() in the stale RT changes.
> > > 
> > 
> > Hum, actually, you hit the same thing with setup/remove_irq (and I'm not sure
> > to follow why):
> 
> It's the kmalloc of the proc interface. So back to the drawing
> board. I'll think about it tomorrow with brain awake.

So the only idea I could come up with is the old approach of creating
a dummy irq chip for the interrupts which share that timer/uart/rtc
whatever line.

I think Boris Brezillon had implemented it at some point, but it was
shot down for reasons I can't remember. That would allow us to simply
have disable_irq_nosync/enable_irq in the relevant code pathes and be
done with it. I guess I need to find the references and give it a try
again if nobody beats me to it.

Thanks,

	tglx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web