Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1195868 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-30 11:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-07-30 11:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 16/20] power/reset: at91-reset: remove useless at91_reset_platform_probe() Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> - 2015-07-30 11:50 +0200
| From | Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-30 11:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 16/20] power/reset: at91-reset: remove useless at91_reset_platform_probe() |
| Message-ID | <pRSDo-2XA-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Dear Alexandre Belloni,
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 02:22:02 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> static int at91_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> - ret = at91_reset_of_probe(pdev);
> - else
> - ret = at91_reset_platform_probe(pdev);
>
> + ret = at91_reset_of_probe(pdev);
Maybe it no longer makes sense to have separate at91_reset_probe() and
at91_reset_of_probe() functions then.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web