Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1191137 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Add support for additional bq27xxx devices

Started byAndreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com>
First post2015-07-23 19:10 +0200
Last post2015-07-23 19:10 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0/8] Add support for additional bq27xxx devices Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com> - 2015-07-23 19:10 +0200

#1191137 — Re: [PATCH 0/8] Add support for additional bq27xxx devices

FromAndreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com>
Date2015-07-23 19:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8] Add support for additional bq27xxx devices
Message-ID<pPsan-4z3-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 07/23/2015 11:27 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 July 2015 16:51:52 Andrew F. Davis wrote:

<snip>

> And I have another question for you: I see that there are now more
> bq24*_charger.c drivers for TI BQ charger chips. Do you think if it is
> possible to do some cleanup & merge? Or all those charger chips
> different and every one should live in own kernel module?
 
Pali,
on a related note I recently started working on a new driver named
bq242xx_charger.c that will add support for the following devices:

bq24250
bq24251
bq24261M
bq24262

These are TI's key devices in the bq2425x and bq2426x sub-families. I was
actually also thinking about some larger consolidation but was
concerned about touching/breaking existing stuff and decided to do one
step at a time. And yes while there is some system-level overlap between
most bq24xxx I'm also worried that providing good coverage of all
important device features for all different bq24xxx devices would yield
a very large and hard to understand driver.

As part of the bq242xx_charger.c development I'm keeping a close eye on
the existing bq24xxx drivers. If there seems an elegant way to do some
consolidation after all I might be able to broaden the scope of my work.

This being said I welcome additional ideas/suggestions here but for this
we should probably start a new thread.

Regards,

-- 
Andreas Dannenberg
Texas Instruments Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web