Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1190049 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-22 17:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-07-22 18:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
Having Linux handle different "types" of memory Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> - 2015-07-22 17:20 +0200
Re: Having Linux handle different "types" of memory Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2015-07-22 18:30 +0200
| From | Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 17:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Having Linux handle different "types" of memory |
| Message-ID | <pP3Ym-2d9-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello everyone, I'm using an ARMv7 platform (Cortex A9) on Linux 3.14 The system supports two memory modules. For performance reasons, memory is "transparently" interleaved (with a 128-byte grain). That is, when the CPU accesses addresses 0-127, it hits DRAM0; addresses 128-255, it hits DRAM1, and so on. The problem is that other devices in the system, mainly the Ethernet controller, didn't get the "transparent interleaving" treatment. They just see DRAM0 and DRAM1. And I'm guessing this will generate all kinds of "interesting" problems when I try to DMA from the Ethernet controller's memory to DRAM... Is there a way to tell Linux: 1) this 1GB memory chunk here is for you and your private allocations, but don't use it for talking to devices/peripherals. 2) this 1GB memory chunk there is for talking to devices/peripherals, but it has lower performance, so try not to use it for your own private memory pools, but you can if memory is /really/ tight. Is there something like this? Maybe one of the NUMA policies? https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt (I don't see any arch/arm/mm/numa.c however) Maybe I can pretend that there is some kind of IOMMU? https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt arch/arm/include/asm/dma-iommu.h Or maybe there is an obvious solution that I'm missing? Regards. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 18:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pP546-3Jm-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1190049 |
On 07/22/2015 08:19 AM, Mason wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm using an ARMv7 platform (Cortex A9) on Linux 3.14 > > The system supports two memory modules. > > For performance reasons, memory is "transparently" interleaved > (with a 128-byte grain). That is, when the CPU accesses addresses > 0-127, it hits DRAM0; addresses 128-255, it hits DRAM1, and so on. > > The problem is that other devices in the system, mainly the > Ethernet controller, didn't get the "transparent interleaving" > treatment. They just see DRAM0 and DRAM1. And I'm guessing this > will generate all kinds of "interesting" problems when I try to > DMA from the Ethernet controller's memory to DRAM... > > Is there a way to tell Linux: > > 1) this 1GB memory chunk here is for you and your private allocations, > but don't use it for talking to devices/peripherals. > > 2) this 1GB memory chunk there is for talking to devices/peripherals, > but it has lower performance, so try not to use it for your own > private memory pools, but you can if memory is /really/ tight. > > Is there something like this? > > Maybe one of the NUMA policies? > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt > (I don't see any arch/arm/mm/numa.c however) > > Maybe I can pretend that there is some kind of IOMMU? > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt > arch/arm/include/asm/dma-iommu.h > > Or maybe there is an obvious solution that I'm missing? > I don't think there is an easy solution right now. This is still an open problem as far as I know. You might look into whether marking one of the regions as a CMA region would allow you the control you need. Thanks, Laura -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web