Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1189682 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] soft lockup: kill realtime threads before panic

Started byyalin wang <yalin.wang2010@gmail.com>
First post2015-07-22 09:00 +0200
Last post2015-07-22 09:00 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] soft lockup: kill realtime threads before panic yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 09:00 +0200

#1189682 — Re: [PATCH] soft lockup: kill realtime threads before panic

Fromyalin wang <yalin.wang2010@gmail.com>
Date2015-07-22 09:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] soft lockup: kill realtime threads before panic
Message-ID<pOWat-7Gp-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
> On Jul 22, 2015, at 06:07, Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@catern.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
> 
> We have observed cases where the soft lockup detector triggered, but no
> kernel bug existed.  Instead we had a buggy realtime thread that
> monopolized a cpu.  So let's kill the responsible party and not panic
> the entire system.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
> Signed-off-by: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@catern.com>
> ---
> kernel/watchdog.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
> index a6ffa43..2355bd5 100644
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -428,7 +428,10 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
> 		}
> 
> 		add_taint(TAINT_SOFTLOCKUP, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
> -		if (softlockup_panic)
> +		if (rt_prio(current->prio)) {
> +			pr_emerg("killing realtime thread\n");
> +			send_sig(SIGILL, current, 0);
> +		} else if (softlockup_panic)
> 			panic("softlockup: hung tasks");
> 		__this_cpu_write(soft_watchdog_warn, true);
> 	} else
> -- 
just my advice about this patch,
i think should add PF_KTHREAD condition like this:

if (rt_prio(current->prio) && !(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
+			pr_emerg("killing realtime thread\n");
+			send_sig(SIGILL, current, 0);
+		} else if (softlockup_panic)

if soft lockup is caused by kthread, should still panic .

Thanks



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web