Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1189679 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-22 08:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-07-22 08:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Making the generic ACPI GSI layer irqdomain aware Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2015-07-22 08:50 +0200
| From | Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-22 08:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] Making the generic ACPI GSI layer irqdomain aware |
| Message-ID | <pOW0N-7v8-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Marc, On 07/21/2015 06:07 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > The irqdomain code is not entierely really ACPI friendly, as it has > some built-in knowledge of the device-tree. Nothing too harmful, but > enough to scare the ARM ACPI developpers which end up with their own > version of the square wheel. > > This small patch series adapt the irqdomain code to remove the hurdles > that prevent the full blown irqdomain subsystem to be used on ACPI, > creates an interface between the GSI layer and the irqdomain, and as > an example, convert the ARM GIC ACPI support to use irqdomains as > originally intended. > > Overall, this gives us a way to use irqdomains on both DT and ACPI > enabled platforms, having very little changes made to the actual > drivers (other than the probing infrastructure). Because we keep the > flow of information between the various layers identical between ACPI > and DT, we immediately benefit from the existing infrastructure. > > I'd really like to hear what people think of that approach, as it > looks to me a lot simpler than the other approaches currently put on > the list. The "convert the GSI information to be DT friendly" is > admitedly not very pretty, but I see it as a stepping stone towards > unifying the two structures. > > This has been test-booted on Juno, and is based on my irq/ncpi-msi-2 > branch. Thank you very much for putting them together, really appreciated. I will comment on each patch and test them. Thanks Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web