Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1187880 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-20 01:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-07-20 01:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[RFC 3/3] slab.h: use check_mul_overflow in kmalloc_array Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> - 2015-07-20 01:20 +0200
| From | Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-20 01:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC 3/3] slab.h: use check_mul_overflow in kmalloc_array |
| Message-ID | <pO62e-iN-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
For recent enough gcc, check_mul_overflow maps to
__builtin_mul_overflow, which on e.g. x86 allows gcc to do the
multiplication and then check the overflow flag, instead of doing a
separate comparison (which may even involve an expensive division, in
the cases where size is not a compile-time constant).
Unfortunately, it's not necessarily always a performance improvement:
For example, when size is a compile-time constant power-of-2, gcc will
now do the multiplication using the mul instruction instead of doing a
comparison against an immediate and then a left shift for the
multiplication. However, I think the compiler should be trusted to
optimize the code - nothing prevents it from doing the overflow check
the old way.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
---
include/linux/slab.h | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
index a99f0e5243e1..82e49dee938d 100644
--- a/include/linux/slab.h
+++ b/include/linux/slab.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/gfp.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
+#include <linux/overflow.h>
/*
@@ -524,9 +525,11 @@ int memcg_update_all_caches(int num_memcgs);
*/
static inline void *kmalloc_array(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
{
- if (size != 0 && n > SIZE_MAX / size)
+ size_t prod;
+
+ if (check_mul_overflow(n, size, &prod))
return NULL;
- return __kmalloc(n * size, flags);
+ return __kmalloc(prod, flags);
}
/**
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web