Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1186115 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-16 19:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-07-17 14:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] gpio/davinci: add interrupt support for GPIOs 16-31 Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@ti.com> - 2015-07-16 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] gpio/davinci: add interrupt support for GPIOs 16-31 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> - 2015-07-17 07:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] gpio/davinci: add interrupt support for GPIOs 16-31 Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@ti.com> - 2015-07-17 14:20 +0200
| From | Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-16 19:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] gpio/davinci: add interrupt support for GPIOs 16-31 |
| Message-ID | <pMViy-57c-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 07/16/2015 05:04 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Tuesday 14 July 2015 07:31 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@ti.com> wrote: >> >>> Interrupts for GPIOs 16 through 31 are enabled by bit 1 in the >>> "binten" register (offset 8). Previous versions of GPIO only >>> used bit 0, which enables GPIO 0-15 interrupts. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Reece Pollack <x0183204@ti.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@ti.com> >> >> Sekhar/Kevin: OK with this? We don't have a maintainer >> listed for davinci GPIO so I assume it's you guys... > > Hi Linus, I had reviewed this patch and there was a v2 send based on my > comments on July 03. > >> Should this be tagged for stable? > > Not sure about that. It affects Keystone devices. Vitaly? > > Thanks, > Sekhar > We used this patch for a long time. So, I guess it is stable. Thanks, Vitaly -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-17 07:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pN64h-41z-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1186115 |
On Thursday 16 July 2015 11:11 PM, Vitaly Andrianov wrote: > > > On 07/16/2015 05:04 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Tuesday 14 July 2015 07:31 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@ti.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Interrupts for GPIOs 16 through 31 are enabled by bit 1 in the >>>> "binten" register (offset 8). Previous versions of GPIO only >>>> used bit 0, which enables GPIO 0-15 interrupts. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Reece Pollack <x0183204@ti.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@ti.com> >>> >>> Sekhar/Kevin: OK with this? We don't have a maintainer >>> listed for davinci GPIO so I assume it's you guys... >> >> Hi Linus, I had reviewed this patch and there was a v2 send based on my >> comments on July 03. >> >>> Should this be tagged for stable? >> >> Not sure about that. It affects Keystone devices. Vitaly? >> >> Thanks, >> Sekhar >> > We used this patch for a long time. So, I guess it is stable. You misunderstood. Should this patch be marked for backporting to older kernels because it fixes a critical issue on devices otherwise working in that kernel? See Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt Thanks, Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-17 14:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pNcMq-59N-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1186448 |
On 07/17/2015 01:02 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Thursday 16 July 2015 11:11 PM, Vitaly Andrianov wrote: >> >> >> On 07/16/2015 05:04 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>> On Tuesday 14 July 2015 07:31 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@ti.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Interrupts for GPIOs 16 through 31 are enabled by bit 1 in the >>>>> "binten" register (offset 8). Previous versions of GPIO only >>>>> used bit 0, which enables GPIO 0-15 interrupts. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Reece Pollack <x0183204@ti.com> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@ti.com> >>>> >>>> Sekhar/Kevin: OK with this? We don't have a maintainer >>>> listed for davinci GPIO so I assume it's you guys... >>> >>> Hi Linus, I had reviewed this patch and there was a v2 send based on my >>> comments on July 03. >>> >>>> Should this be tagged for stable? >>> >>> Not sure about that. It affects Keystone devices. Vitaly? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sekhar >>> >> We used this patch for a long time. So, I guess it is stable. > > You misunderstood. Should this patch be marked for backporting to older > kernels because it fixes a critical issue on devices otherwise working > in that kernel? See Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt > > Thanks, > Sekhar > Sorry. As I understand from the stable_kernel_rules.txt this patch _IS_ _NOT_ for "-stable" Thanks, Vitaly -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web