Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1182298 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-12 10:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-07-12 10:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 5/7] locking/pvqspinlock: Add pending bit support Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-07-12 10:30 +0200
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-12 10:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/7] locking/pvqspinlock: Add pending bit support |
| Message-ID | <pLkO6-5ZO-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 04:36:56PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > Like the native qspinlock, using the pending bit when it is lightly > loaded to acquire the lock is faster than going through the PV queuing > process which is even slower than the native queuing process. It also > avoids loading two additional cachelines (the MCS and PV nodes). > > This patch adds the pending bit support for PV qspinlock. The > pending bit code has a smaller spin threshold. It will default back > to the queuing method if it cannot acquired the lock within a certain > time limit. -ENONUMBERS -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web