Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1177936 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order

Started by"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
First post2015-07-07 00:00 +0200
Last post2015-07-08 00:30 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-07-07 00:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse  order Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2015-07-08 00:30 +0200

#1177936 — Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order

From"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Date2015-07-07 00:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order
Message-ID<pJmAF-5kl-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Monday, July 06, 2015 05:05:29 PM Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:24 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > >> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> > >> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >> > > On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >> > > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > 
> > []
> > 
> > >> > > > Applied, thanks.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hmm… Seems kinda mistake. I can't see this applied (and required
> > >> > > previous patches 4 and 5) to any of your branch neither in
> > >> > > (today's)
> > >> > > linux-next.
> > >> >
> > >> > New stuff applied after v4.1 couldn't show up in -next before v4.2
> > >> > -rc1 was
> > >> > released (which just happened last night)?
> > >>
> > >> Might be, I would like to resend new version of my series and that's
> > >> why I would like to have a branch to check what is already applied. So,
> > >> if I can't see it does it mean it is brewed in the private repository?
> > >
> > > If you have patches that depend on this, they either need to come
> > > through my tree, or you have to wait until the next kernel version
> > > (which you probably don't want, right?).
> > >
> > > The alternative is that I unapply this patch and the whole lot can be
> > > sucked up by the most appropriate subsystem.
> > 
> > I resent a new version for other comments(still with all patches
> > included). Meanwhile the patches 4-6 (from v4 or v5, where they are
> > the same) could be applied in the first place. Can you clarify what
> > exactly you have applied? The idea is to put the rest via your
> > subsystem since it's most appropriate for this series.
> 
> Easiest thing for me to do is unapply.
> 
> We can take the whole series when all the Acks have been accrued.

So are there any ACKs missing from the last series posted by Andy?

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1179124 — Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order

FromStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Date2015-07-08 00:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order
Message-ID<pJJxg-2Zd-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1177936
On 07/06/2015 11:51 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> So are there any ACKs missing from the last series posted by Andy?
> Yes, I have requested a Clk Ack, as there are some, lets say
> interesting code in the MFD driver which I am unsure about.  However,
> we have caught Mike at an awkward time, as he is in the middle of
> transitioning jobs.
>
> Perhaps Stephen Boyd (now Cc'ed) might have a look.
>

Context? I found the cover letter.

clkdev is maintained by Russell. You could get his ack for the usage of
the clkdev_create() API, but I'm not sure why it's needed. The API was
merged into Linus' tree so I think you have everything you need.

$ git tag -l --contains 2568999835d7797afce3dcc3a3f368051ffcaf1f v4*
v4.2-rc1


-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web