Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1177936 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-07 00:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-07-08 00:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-07-07 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2015-07-08 00:30 +0200
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 00:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order |
| Message-ID | <pJmAF-5kl-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Monday, July 06, 2015 05:05:29 PM Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > >> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:24 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > >> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko > > >> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > >> > > On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > >> > > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > [] > > > > >> > > > Applied, thanks. > > >> > > > > >> > > Hmm… Seems kinda mistake. I can't see this applied (and required > > >> > > previous patches 4 and 5) to any of your branch neither in > > >> > > (today's) > > >> > > linux-next. > > >> > > > >> > New stuff applied after v4.1 couldn't show up in -next before v4.2 > > >> > -rc1 was > > >> > released (which just happened last night)? > > >> > > >> Might be, I would like to resend new version of my series and that's > > >> why I would like to have a branch to check what is already applied. So, > > >> if I can't see it does it mean it is brewed in the private repository? > > > > > > If you have patches that depend on this, they either need to come > > > through my tree, or you have to wait until the next kernel version > > > (which you probably don't want, right?). > > > > > > The alternative is that I unapply this patch and the whole lot can be > > > sucked up by the most appropriate subsystem. > > > > I resent a new version for other comments(still with all patches > > included). Meanwhile the patches 4-6 (from v4 or v5, where they are > > the same) could be applied in the first place. Can you clarify what > > exactly you have applied? The idea is to put the rest via your > > subsystem since it's most appropriate for this series. > > Easiest thing for me to do is unapply. > > We can take the whole series when all the Acks have been accrued. So are there any ACKs missing from the last series posted by Andy? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 00:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order |
| Message-ID | <pJJxg-2Zd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1177936 |
On 07/06/2015 11:51 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> So are there any ACKs missing from the last series posted by Andy? > Yes, I have requested a Clk Ack, as there are some, lets say > interesting code in the MFD driver which I am unsure about. However, > we have caught Mike at an awkward time, as he is in the middle of > transitioning jobs. > > Perhaps Stephen Boyd (now Cc'ed) might have a look. > Context? I found the cover letter. clkdev is maintained by Russell. You could get his ack for the usage of the clkdev_create() API, but I'm not sure why it's needed. The API was merged into Linus' tree so I think you have everything you need. $ git tag -l --contains 2568999835d7797afce3dcc3a3f368051ffcaf1f v4* v4.2-rc1 -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web