Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1176715 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-03 18:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-07-03 18:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH?] Livelock in pick_next_task_fair() / idle_balance() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-07-03 18:40 +0200
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-03 18:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH?] Livelock in pick_next_task_fair() / idle_balance() |
| Message-ID | <pIcal-2qj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 07:25:11AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 40a7fcb..f7cc1ef 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5898,6 +5898,10 @@ static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
> return 0;
>
> while (!list_empty(tasks)) {
> +
> + if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE && env->src_rq->nr_running <= 1)
Should we make that ->idle != CPU_NOT_IDLE ?
> + break;
> +
> p = list_first_entry(tasks, struct task_struct, se.group_node);
>
> env->loop++;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web