Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1175847 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpio: defer probe if pinctrl cannot be found

Started byGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
First post2015-07-02 11:10 +0200
Last post2015-07-02 11:10 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpio: defer probe if pinctrl cannot be found Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-07-02 11:10 +0200

#1175847 — Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpio: defer probe if pinctrl cannot be found

FromGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date2015-07-02 11:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpio: defer probe if pinctrl cannot be found
Message-ID<pHIFk-Jv-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Rob,

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> wrote:
>> When an OF node has a pin range for its GPIOs, return -EPROBE_DEFER if
>> the pin controller isn't available.
>>
>> Otherwise, the GPIO range wouldn't be set at all unless the pin
>> controller probed always before the GPIO chip.
>>
>> With this change, the probe of the GPIO chip will be deferred and will
>> be retried at a later point, hopefully once the pin controller has been
>> registered and probed already.
>
> This will break cases where the pinctrl driver does not exist, but the
> DT contains pinctrl bindings. We can have similar problems already
> with clocks though. However, IMO this problem is a bit different in
> that pinctrl is more likely entirely optional while clocks are often
> required. You may do all pin setup in bootloader/firmware on some
> boards and not others. Of course then why put pinctrl in the DT in
> that case? They could be present just due to how chip vs. board dts
> files are structured.

Isn't that already the case?
If I change the compatible value of a pinctrl node to an invalid value, I get:

    sh-sci e6c50000.serial: could not find pctldev for node
/pfc@e6050000/serial1, deferring probe

> We could address this by simply marking the pin controller node
> disabled. However, ...

Doesn't seem to make any difference.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web