Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1173872 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-29 17:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-06-30 04:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 0/8] mm: mirrored memory support for page buddy allocations Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2015-06-29 17:20 +0200
Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 0/8] mm: mirrored memory support for page buddy allocations Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2015-06-30 03:40 +0200
Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 0/8] mm: mirrored memory support for page buddy allocations Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2015-06-30 04:00 +0200
Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 0/8] mm: mirrored memory support for page buddy allocations Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2015-06-30 04:50 +0200
| From | Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-29 17:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 0/8] mm: mirrored memory support for page buddy allocations |
| Message-ID | <pGJ0K-6L7-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 06/26/2015 07:19 PM, Xishi Qiu wrote: > drivers/base/node.c | 17 ++++--- > fs/proc/meminfo.c | 6 +++ > include/linux/memblock.h | 29 ++++++++++-- > include/linux/mmzone.h | 10 ++++ > include/linux/vmstat.h | 2 + > mm/Kconfig | 8 ++++ > mm/memblock.c | 33 +++++++++++-- > mm/nobootmem.c | 3 ++ > mm/page_alloc.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > mm/vmstat.c | 4 ++ > 10 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) Has there been any performance analysis done on this code? I'm always nervous when I see page_alloc.c churn. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-30 03:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pGSGL-3PE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1173872 |
On 2015/6/29 23:19, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 06/26/2015 07:19 PM, Xishi Qiu wrote: >> drivers/base/node.c | 17 ++++--- >> fs/proc/meminfo.c | 6 +++ >> include/linux/memblock.h | 29 ++++++++++-- >> include/linux/mmzone.h | 10 ++++ >> include/linux/vmstat.h | 2 + >> mm/Kconfig | 8 ++++ >> mm/memblock.c | 33 +++++++++++-- >> mm/nobootmem.c | 3 ++ >> mm/page_alloc.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >> mm/vmstat.c | 4 ++ >> 10 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) > > Has there been any performance analysis done on this code? I'm always > nervous when I see page_alloc.c churn. > Not yet, which benchmark do you suggest? Thanks, Xishi Qiu > > > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-30 04:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pGT05-4c5-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1174172 |
On 06/29/2015 06:26 PM, Xishi Qiu wrote: >> > Has there been any performance analysis done on this code? I'm always >> > nervous when I see page_alloc.c churn. >> > > Not yet, which benchmark do you suggest? mmtests is always a good place to start. aim9. I'm partial to will-it-scale. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-30 04:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pGTMu-5rN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1174186 |
On 2015/6/30 9:52, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 06/29/2015 06:26 PM, Xishi Qiu wrote: >>>> Has there been any performance analysis done on this code? I'm always >>>> nervous when I see page_alloc.c churn. >>>> >> Not yet, which benchmark do you suggest? > > mmtests is always a good place to start. aim9. I'm partial to > will-it-scale. > I see, thank you. > > > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web