Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1173889 > unrolled thread

[PATCH-V5 2/4] mfd: 88pm800: Remove unnecessary protection around pdata

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  [PATCH-V5 2/4] mfd: 88pm800: Remove unnecessary protection around pdata Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> - 2015-06-29 17:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH-V5 2/4] mfd: 88pm800: Remove unnecessary protection around pdata Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-06-30 02:40 +0200

#1173889 — [PATCH-V5 2/4] mfd: 88pm800: Remove unnecessary protection around pdata

With addition of proper checks in place in pm800_probe function,
which makes sure that pdata would never become NULL.
So remove all unnecessary protection around pdata in whole
driver code.

Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/mfd/88pm800.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
index 40fd014..d495737 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static int device_gpadc_init(struct pm80x_chip *chip,
 	mask = (PM800_GPADC_GP_BIAS_EN0 | PM800_GPADC_GP_BIAS_EN1 |
 		PM800_GPADC_GP_BIAS_EN2 | PM800_GPADC_GP_BIAS_EN3);
 
-	if (pdata && (pdata->batt_det == 0))
+	if (pdata->batt_det == 0)
 		data = (PM800_GPADC_GP_BIAS_EN0 | PM800_GPADC_GP_BIAS_EN1 |
 			PM800_GPADC_GP_BIAS_EN2 | PM800_GPADC_GP_BIAS_EN3);
 	else
@@ -342,11 +342,9 @@ static int device_rtc_init(struct pm80x_chip *chip,
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	if (pdata) {
-		rtc_devs[0].platform_data = pdata->rtc;
-		rtc_devs[0].pdata_size =
-				pdata->rtc ? sizeof(struct pm80x_rtc_pdata) : 0;
-	}
+	rtc_devs[0].platform_data = pdata->rtc;
+	rtc_devs[0].pdata_size = pdata->rtc ? sizeof(struct pm80x_rtc_pdata) : 0;
+
 	ret = mfd_add_devices(chip->dev, 0, &rtc_devs[0],
 			      ARRAY_SIZE(rtc_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
 	if (ret) {
@@ -503,7 +501,7 @@ static int device_800_init(struct pm80x_chip *chip,
 		goto out;
 	}
 	if (val & PM800_ALARM_WAKEUP) {
-		if (pdata && pdata->rtc)
+		if (pdata->rtc)
 			pdata->rtc->rtc_wakeup = 1;
 	}
 
@@ -602,7 +600,7 @@ static int pm800_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 		goto err_device_init;
 	}
 
-	if (pdata && pdata->plat_config)
+	if (pdata->plat_config)
 		pdata->plat_config(chip, pdata);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1174156

2015-06-30 0:31 GMT+09:00 Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>:
> With addition of proper checks in place in pm800_probe function,
> which makes sure that pdata would never become NULL.
> So remove all unnecessary protection around pdata in whole
> driver code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/88pm800.c | 14 ++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web