Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1171955 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-25 10:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-06-25 11:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable support for PWM Regulators Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-06-25 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable support for PWM Regulators Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> - 2015-06-25 11:20 +0200
| From | Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-25 10:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable support for PWM Regulators |
| Message-ID | <pFb18-3Dh-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Lee, > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > > --- > > arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > > index f632af0..6666973 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > > @@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ CONFIG_REGULATOR_MAX8907=y > > CONFIG_REGULATOR_MAX8973=y > > CONFIG_REGULATOR_MAX77686=y > > CONFIG_REGULATOR_PALMAS=y > > +CONFIG_REGULATOR_PWM=y > > The current policy is to build as much as possible as a module in > multi_v7_defconfig. Since this is a tristate Kconfig symbol, could you > please change it to =m ? I would prefer that it stays built-in. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-25 11:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable support for PWM Regulators |
| Message-ID | <pFbua-4qv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1171955 |
Hello Lee, On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: [...] >> > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >> > index f632af0..6666973 100644 >> > --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >> > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >> > @@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ CONFIG_REGULATOR_MAX8907=y >> > CONFIG_REGULATOR_MAX8973=y >> > CONFIG_REGULATOR_MAX77686=y >> > CONFIG_REGULATOR_PALMAS=y >> > +CONFIG_REGULATOR_PWM=y >> >> The current policy is to build as much as possible as a module in >> multi_v7_defconfig. Since this is a tristate Kconfig symbol, could you >> please change it to =m ? > > I would prefer that it stays built-in. > Ok, I've no strong opinion on this. I was just mentioning what arm-soc maintainers prefer nowadays. May I ask what's the rationale for leaving this option built-in? Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web