Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1173164 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 3/9] arm: add call to CPU idle quirks handler

Started byRussell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
First post2015-06-27 00:30 +0200
Last post2015-06-27 00:30 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 3/9] arm: add call to CPU idle quirks handler Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-06-27 00:30 +0200

#1173164 — Re: [PATCH 3/9] arm: add call to CPU idle quirks handler

FromRussell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Date2015-06-27 00:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/9] arm: add call to CPU idle quirks handler
Message-ID<pFKid-3FA-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:52:23PM +0200, Paul Osmialowski wrote:
> I tried it and it works. This approach does not cause code duplication, but
> (comparing to arm_pm_idle-based approach) its long. Would something like
> this be accepted ever?
> 
> Note that contrary to proc-v7, there's no __v7m_proc macro, I had to define
> it in order to avoid another code duplication:

And I don't like it - until we have word from Uwe, I'd like to keep this
simple and restricted just to the affected SoC.  Until we have it proven
that this is a generic problem, we shouldn't go treating it as such.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web