Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1171758 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: mediatek: add mt6580 basic support

Started byMars Cheng <mars.cheng@mediatek.com>
First post2015-06-25 02:20 +0200
Last post2015-07-03 15:40 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: mediatek: add mt6580 basic support Mars Cheng <mars.cheng@mediatek.com> - 2015-06-25 02:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: mediatek: add mt6580 basic support Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> - 2015-07-03 15:40 +0200

#1171758 — Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: mediatek: add mt6580 basic support

FromMars Cheng <mars.cheng@mediatek.com>
Date2015-06-25 02:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: mediatek: add mt6580 basic support
Message-ID<pF33z-on-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 22:25 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 07:59:13 PM Mars Cheng wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 21:45 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > > > +	soc {
> > > 
> > > Please drop the soc node as well and just add the components directly.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Matthias
> > 
> > May I know the reason to remove the soc node? I follow other xxxx.dtsi
> > to add this node.
> 
> The device tree is reflecting the hardware, if you add a soc node like this, it 
> is seen like a bus, but there is not really a bus.
> 
> I think point of view about this has change over time and nowadays it is 
> preferred not to add a soc node.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias
Got it. Will remove the soc node and prepare the new patch.

Thanks a lot.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1176583

FromMatthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Date2015-07-03 15:40 +0200
Message-ID<pI9ma-E1-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1171758
On Thursday, July 02, 2015 11:29:01 AM Mars Cheng wrote:
> Hi Matthias
> 
> May I double confirm with you that soc node is MUST removed?
> If yes, we will upstream dtsi with this format for other new chips.

Please don't top post.
Yes, soc node has to be removed.

Cheers,
Matthias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web