Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1167509 > unrolled thread

Re: [RFC 1/4] mm, thp: stop preallocating hugepages in khugepaged

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [RFC 1/4] mm, thp: stop preallocating hugepages in khugepaged David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2015-06-18 02:40 +0200

#1167509 — Re: [RFC 1/4] mm, thp: stop preallocating hugepages in khugepaged

On Mon, 11 May 2015, Vlastimil Babka wrote:

> Khugepaged tries to preallocate a hugepage before scanning for THP collapse
> candidates. If the preallocation fails, scanning is not attempted. This makes
> sense, but it is only restricted to !NUMA configurations, where it does not
> need to predict on which node to preallocate.
> 
> Besides the !NUMA restriction, the preallocated page may also end up being
> unused and put back when no collapse candidate is found. I have observed the
> thp_collapse_alloc vmstat counter to have 3+ times the value of the counter
> of actually collapsed pages in /sys/.../khugepaged/pages_collapsed. On the
> other hand, the periodic hugepage allocation attempts involving sync
> compaction can be beneficial for the antifragmentation mechanism, but that's
> however harder to evaluate.
> 
> The following patch will introduce per-node THP availability tracking, which
> has more benefits than current preallocation and is applicable to CONFIG_NUMA.
> We can therefore remove the preallocation, which also allows a cleanup of the
> functions involved in khugepaged allocations. Another small benefit of the
> patch is that NUMA configs can now reuse an allocated hugepage for another
> collapse attempt, if the previous one was for the same node and failed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

I think this is fine if the rest of the series is adopted, and I 
understand how the removal and cleanup is easier when done first before 
the following patches.  I think you can unify alloc_hugepage_node() for 
both NUMA and !NUMA configs and inline it in khugepaged_alloc_page().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web