Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1167414 > unrolled thread
| Started by | David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-18 01:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-06-18 02:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] mm/mempool: allow NULL `pool' pointer in mempool_destroy() David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2015-06-18 01:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] mm/mempool: allow NULL `pool' pointer in mempool_destroy() Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 02:00 +0200
| From | David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-18 01:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] mm/mempool: allow NULL `pool' pointer in mempool_destroy() |
| Message-ID | <pCuWo-7JA-47@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > mempool_destroy() does not tolerate a NULL mempool_t pointer > argument and performs a NULL-pointer dereference. This requires > additional attention and effort from developers/reviewers and > forces all mempool_destroy() callers to do a NULL check > > if (pool) > mempool_destroy(pool); > > Or, otherwise, be invalid mempool_destroy() users. > > Tweak mempool_destroy() and NULL-check the pointer there. > > Proposed by Andrew Morton. > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > LKML-reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/8/583 Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> I like how your patch series is enabling us to remove many lines from the source code. But doing s/Reported-by/Suggested-by/ can also make your changelog two lines shorter ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-18 02:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pCvpo-8ib-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1167414 |
On (06/17/15 16:21), David Rientjes wrote: [..] > > Tweak mempool_destroy() and NULL-check the pointer there. > > > > Proposed by Andrew Morton. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > > Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > LKML-reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/8/583 > > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> > > I like how your patch series is enabling us to remove many lines from the > source code. But doing s/Reported-by/Suggested-by/ can also make your > changelog two lines shorter ;) > Thanks. Oh, s/Reported-by/Suggested-by/ looks better, indeed. -ss -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web