Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1166327 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 1/4] kernfs: make kernfs_get_inode() public

Started byTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
First post2015-06-16 21:20 +0200
Last post2015-06-16 23:00 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 1/4] kernfs: make kernfs_get_inode() public Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2015-06-16 21:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/4] kernfs: make kernfs_get_inode() public Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-06-16 23:00 +0200

#1166327 — [PATCH 1/4] kernfs: make kernfs_get_inode() public

FromTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date2015-06-16 21:20 +0200
Subject[PATCH 1/4] kernfs: make kernfs_get_inode() public
Message-ID<pC4yS-3dz-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Move kernfs_get_inode() prototype from fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h to
include/linux/kernfs.h.  It obtains the matching inode for a
kernfs_node.

It will be used by cgroup for inode based permission checks for now
but is generally useful.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
Hello, Greg.

Given that cgroup will be the first and only, for now, user, I think
it'd be the eaiest to route this with the related cgroup patches
through the cgroup tree.  What do you think?

Thanks.

 fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h | 1 -
 include/linux/kernfs.h      | 5 +++++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h b/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h
index af9fa74..6762bfb 100644
--- a/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h
+++ b/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h
@@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *kernfs_node_cache;
 /*
  * inode.c
  */
-struct inode *kernfs_get_inode(struct super_block *sb, struct kernfs_node *kn);
 void kernfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode);
 int kernfs_iop_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask);
 int kernfs_iop_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *iattr);
diff --git a/include/linux/kernfs.h b/include/linux/kernfs.h
index 71ecdab..e6b2f7d 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernfs.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernfs.h
@@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ void kernfs_put(struct kernfs_node *kn);
 
 struct kernfs_node *kernfs_node_from_dentry(struct dentry *dentry);
 struct kernfs_root *kernfs_root_from_sb(struct super_block *sb);
+struct inode *kernfs_get_inode(struct super_block *sb, struct kernfs_node *kn);
 
 struct kernfs_root *kernfs_create_root(struct kernfs_syscall_ops *scops,
 				       unsigned int flags, void *priv);
@@ -352,6 +353,10 @@ static inline struct kernfs_node *kernfs_node_from_dentry(struct dentry *dentry)
 static inline struct kernfs_root *kernfs_root_from_sb(struct super_block *sb)
 { return NULL; }
 
+static inline struct inode *
+kernfs_get_inode(struct super_block *sb, struct kernfs_node *kn)
+{ return NULL; }
+
 static inline struct kernfs_root *
 kernfs_create_root(struct kernfs_syscall_ops *scops, unsigned int flags,
 		   void *priv)
-- 
2.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1166403

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2015-06-16 23:00 +0200
Message-ID<pC67E-5mw-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1166327
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 03:10:14PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Move kernfs_get_inode() prototype from fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h to
> include/linux/kernfs.h.  It obtains the matching inode for a
> kernfs_node.
> 
> It will be used by cgroup for inode based permission checks for now
> but is generally useful.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
> Hello, Greg.
> 
> Given that cgroup will be the first and only, for now, user, I think
> it'd be the eaiest to route this with the related cgroup patches
> through the cgroup tree.  What do you think?

That's fine with me, feel free to add:

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

to it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web