Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1163609 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 7/8] nohz: Evaluate tick dependency once on context switch

Started byRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
First post2015-06-11 22:50 +0200
Last post2015-06-11 22:50 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 7/8] nohz: Evaluate tick dependency once on context switch Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2015-06-11 22:50 +0200

#1163609 — Re: [PATCH 7/8] nohz: Evaluate tick dependency once on context switch

FromRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Date2015-06-11 22:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 7/8] nohz: Evaluate tick dependency once on context switch
Message-ID<pAhAg-fl-59@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 06/11/2015 01:36 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> The tick dependency is evaluated on every irq. This is a batch of checks
> which determine whether it is safe to stop the tick or not. These checks
> are often split in many details: posix cpu timers, scheduler, sched clock,
> perf events. Each of which are made of smaller details: posix cpu
> timer involves checking process wide timers then thread wide timers. Perf
> involves checking freq events then more per cpu details.
> 
> Checking these details every time we update the full dynticks state
> bring avoidable overhead.
> 
> So lets evaluate these dependencies once on context switch. Then the
> further dependency checks will be performed through a single state check.
> 
> This is a first step that can be later optimized by dividing task level
> dependency, CPU level dependency and global dependency and update
> each at the right time.

> +static void tick_nohz_full_update_dependencies(void)
> +{
> +	struct tick_sched *ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched);
> +
> +	if (!posix_cpu_timers_can_stop_tick(current))
> +		ts->tick_needed |= TICK_NEEDED_POSIX_CPU_TIMER;
> +
> +	if (!perf_event_can_stop_tick())
> +		ts->tick_needed |= TICK_NEEDED_PERF_EVENT;
> +
> +	if (!sched_can_stop_tick())
> +		ts->tick_needed |= TICK_NEEDED_SCHED;
>  

I see this getting kicked from task work and from ipi
context, but does it get kicked on task wakeup, when
we have a second runnable task on a CPU, but we decide
not to preempt the currently running task to switch to
it yet, but we will want to preempt the currently running
task at a later point in time?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web