Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1742092
| From | Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH -v2 02/18] sched/fair: Add comment to calc_cfs_shares() |
| Date | 2017-09-29 15:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uv3df-6Af-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ukUkV-5wR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ukUkW-5wR-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuDVv-7Gp-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <uv1Ob-5yp-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 01:35:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:03:03AM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > > IIUC, if grq->avg.load_avg > grq->load.weight, i.e. you have blocked > > tasks, you can end up with underestimating the ge->load.weight for some > > of the group entities lead to \Sum ge->load.weight < tg->weight. > > Ah yes, you're right. However, if you look at the end of the series we > actually end up with using: > > max(grq->load.weight, grq->avg.load_avg) > > Which I suppose makes it true again. Yes, with the next patch in the series, underestimation is no longer possible.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH -v2 02/18] sched/fair: Add comment to calc_cfs_shares() Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2017-09-28 12:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH -v2 02/18] sched/fair: Add comment to calc_cfs_shares() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-09-29 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH -v2 02/18] sched/fair: Add comment to calc_cfs_shares() Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2017-09-29 15:10 +0200
csiph-web