Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1741199
| From | Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap |
| Date | 2017-09-28 07:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uuzfb-4BT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uufTb-8kl-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uusQp-sS-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <uutW9-17I-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote: >>> In the future, both simple and sophisticated policy like RSS or other guest >>> driven steering policies could be done on top. >> >> IMHO there should be a more practical example before adding all this >> indirection. And it would be nice to understand why this queue selection >> needs to be tun specific. > > I was thinking the same and this reminds me of the various strategies > implemented in packet fanout. tun_cpu_select_queue is analogous to > fanout_demux_cpu though it is tun-specific in that it requires tun->numqueues. > > Fanout accrued various strategies until it gained an eBPF variant. Just > supporting BPF is probably sufficient here, too. +1, in addition to packet fanout, we have SO_REUSEPORT with BPF, RPS, RFS, etc. It would be nice if existing packet steering mechanisms could be leveraged for tun.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-27 10:30 +0200
[PATCH net-next 3/3] tun: introduce cpu id based steering policy Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-27 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-09-28 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 01:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> - 2017-09-28 07:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-28 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-28 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-29 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-10-01 05:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-28 09:00 +0200
csiph-web