Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1741892

Re: [PATCH] x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for GCC 4.4

From Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for GCC 4.4
Date 2017-09-29 03:50 +0200
Message-ID <uuSBb-87i-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <uuKaB-2Wc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuKtX-3hQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuMvM-4ww-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuP0C-5SQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuQSK-70Y-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 04:53:09PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
> > Fixes: f5caf621ee35 ("x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for Clang")
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> 
> Side note: it's not like I personally need the credit, but in general
> I really want people to pick up on who debugged the code and pointed
> to the solution. That's often more of the work than the fix itself.
> 
> The kernel test robot report looked to be ignored as a "gcc-4.4 is too
> old to worry about" thing. People who then step up and analyze the
> problem are rare as it is. They need to be credited in the commit
> logs.
> 
> We don't have any fixed format for that, but it's pretty free-form. So
> we have tags like
> 
>   Root-caused-by:
>   Diagnosed-by:
>   Analyzed-by:
>   Debugged-by:
>   Bisected-by:
>   Fix-suggested-by:
> 
> etc for giving credit to people who figured out some part of a bug
> (and, having grepped for this, we also a _shitload_ of miss-spellings
> of various things ;)

Indeed, credit is important and I try to give it where it's due.  Sorry
for the snub!  I anoint you with:

Debugged-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

-- 
Josh

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm] f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-09-28 18:30 +0200
  Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm] f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-09-28 18:50 +0200
    Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm] f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-09-28 19:10 +0200
      Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm] f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-09-28 21:20 +0200
        [PATCH] x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for GCC 4.4 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-09-29 00:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for GCC 4.4 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-09-29 02:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for GCC 4.4 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-09-29 03:50 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for GCC 4.4 Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-09-29 10:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for GCC 4.4 Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> - 2017-09-29 12:40 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for GCC 4.4 Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-09-29 10:00 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for GCC 4.4 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-09-29 17:30 +0200
          [tip:x86/urgent] x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for GCC  4.4 tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-09-29 11:40 +0200
          [tip:x86/urgent] x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for GCC  4.4 tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-09-29 13:30 +0200

csiph-web