Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1741794
| From | Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables |
| Date | 2017-09-28 21:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uuMP7-4CX-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uumUG-557-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <uumUG-557-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuCwq-6Fg-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuCG6-6IC-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuJey-2kP-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 08:43:54AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:45:35AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:38:01AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 04:49:28PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > In many cases, page tables can be accessed concurrently by either another > > > > CPU (due to things like fast gup) or by the hardware page table walker > > > > itself, which may set access/dirty bits. In such cases, it is important > > > > to use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page table entries so that > > > > entries cannot be torn, merged or subject to apparent loss of coherence. > > > > > > In fact, we should use lockless_dereference() for many of them. Yes > > > Alpha is the only one that cares about the difference between that and > > > READ_ONCE() and they do have the extra barrier, but if we're going to do > > > this, we might as well do it 'right' :-) > > > > I know this sounds daft, but I think one of the big reasons why > > lockless_dereference() doesn't get an awful lot of use is because it's > > such a mouthful! Why don't we just move the smp_read_barrier_depends() > > into READ_ONCE? Would anybody actually care about the potential impact on > > Alpha (which, frankly, is treading on thin ice given the low adoption of > > lockless_dereference())? > > This is my cue to ask my usual question... ;-) > > Are people still running mainline kernels on Alpha? (Added Alpha folks.) Yes. I run two Alpha build daemons that build the unofficial debian-alpha port. Debian popcon reports nine machines running Alpha, which are likely to be running the 4.12.y kernel which is currently in debian-alpha, (and presumably soon to be 4.13.y which is now built on Alpha in experimental). Cheers Michael
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 0/2] Missing READ_ONCE in core and arch-specific pgtable code leading to crashes Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-09-27 18:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-09-28 10:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-09-28 10:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-09-28 17:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-09-28 17:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-09-28 18:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz> - 2017-09-28 21:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-09-29 03:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-09-29 11:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-09-29 18:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-09-29 18:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Missing READ_ONCE in core and arch-specific pgtable code leading to crashes Richard Ruigrok <rruigrok@codeaurora.org> - 2017-09-28 19:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: mm: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE when accessing page tables Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> - 2017-09-28 21:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Missing READ_ONCE in core and arch-specific pgtable code leading to crashes Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> - 2017-09-28 21:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Missing READ_ONCE in core and arch-specific pgtable code leading to crashes Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-09-29 11:00 +0200
csiph-web