Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1741566
| From | Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Print proper scenario if cross deadlock detected at acquisition time |
| Date | 2017-09-28 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uuHmp-1aC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <urqi5-5B6-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uu9up-44s-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 01:31:45AM +0000, Byungchul Park wrote:
>
> Sometimes, it gives a wrong scenario. For example:
>
> lock target
> lock source
> lock parent
> lock target
> lock parent of parent
> lock parent
>
> lock parent of parent
> unlock source
>
> We should consider this scenario as well so the report is always true
> generally.
>
Right, let me think about a proper way to do this.
Regards,
Boqun
> > + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
> > + printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n");
> > } else {
> > printk(" Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n");
> > printk(" CPU0 CPU1\n");
> > --
> > 2.14.1
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Print proper scenario if cross deadlock detected at acquisition time Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-09-27 03:40 +0200 Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Print proper scenario if cross deadlock detected at acquisition time Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 15:50 +0200
csiph-web