Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1741528

Re: [PATCH] staging: fsl-mc/dpio: Fix incorrect comparison

From "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] staging: fsl-mc/dpio: Fix incorrect comparison
Date 2017-09-28 15:20 +0200
Message-ID <uuGTo-10S-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <uuGqm-C7-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuGqm-C7-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuGJI-XA-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 01:07:48PM +0000, Ruxandra Ioana Radulescu wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@oracle.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:49 PM
> > To: Ruxandra Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@nxp.com>
> > Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; devel@driverdev.osuosl.org;
> > arnd@arndb.de; stuyoder@gmail.com; Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@nxp.com>;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; agraf@suse.de; Bogdan Purcareata
> > <bogdan.purcareata@nxp.com>; Laurentiu Tudor
> > <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fsl-mc/dpio: Fix incorrect comparison
> > 
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:57:28PM -0500, Ioana Radulescu wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/dpio/dpio-service.c
> > b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/dpio/dpio-service.c
> > > index f809682..26922fc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/dpio/dpio-service.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/dpio/dpio-service.c
> > > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static inline struct dpaa2_io
> > *service_select_by_cpu(struct dpaa2_io *d,
> > >  	if (d)
> > >  		return d;
> > >
> > > -	if (unlikely(cpu >= num_possible_cpus()))
> > > +	if (unlikely(cpu >= (int)num_possible_cpus()))
> > 
> > 
> > Drivers shouldn't use likely/unlikley.
>  
> I was under the impression it's ok to use them on hotpath
> (and while not entirely obvious, this function is called on
> other drivers' hotpath).

Only use it if you can measure the difference.  If you can not, then do
not use it as the compiler and the CPU will guess it better than you
will.

This has been proven many times, something like 80% of our
likely/unlikely usage in the kernel is wrong because of this, see the
work from Andi Kleen many years ago in this area.

So please remove it.  Unless you can prove it matters, and if so,
document that.

thanks,

greg k-h

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] staging: fsl-mc/dpio: Fix incorrect comparison Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-09-28 14:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] staging: fsl-mc/dpio: Fix incorrect comparison Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-09-28 15:00 +0200
  RE: [PATCH] staging: fsl-mc/dpio: Fix incorrect comparison Ruxandra Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@nxp.com> - 2017-09-28 15:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] staging: fsl-mc/dpio: Fix incorrect comparison "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-09-28 15:20 +0200
      RE: [PATCH] staging: fsl-mc/dpio: Fix incorrect comparison Ruxandra Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@nxp.com> - 2017-09-28 15:30 +0200

csiph-web