Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1741482
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC] futex: hashbucket as list of futex instead of waiters |
| Date | 2017-09-28 14:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uuFXk-sz-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uoih4-1pe-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuEHW-7Wb-43@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 11:41:58PM +0200, Gerd Gerats wrote: > > When using futex as a condition variable, for example: to manage a > > threadpool, there may be a lot of threads inside the futex_wait to sleep on > > this futex. The futex_hash_bucket consists therefore of many struct futex_q > > for the same futex. > > > > On bad luck another futex, used as mutex, hashed into the same bucket. > > Every futex_wake on this mutex, has to scan the whole chain of above waiter > > to find the struct futex_q for this mutex. For non-unusual threadpool sizes > > of more than 20, this should be a considerable effort. > > > > I therefore suggest to include in the hash-bucketchain only one struct > > futex_q per futex and to queue additional waiter in an extrachain at the > > 'top' futex_q entry. Thus different futex are isolated from each other, the > > cost of a hash collision is reduced. > > So I don't dislike that idea.. however > > > To show the idea, I added a sample patch. Here, the plist is exchanged for > > a futex-specific implementation. kernel/pring.h is certainly not not the > > right place. > > So I suppose the purpose of that plist in futex is to enable waking up > the highest prio waiter, but with the advent of SCHED_DEADLINE that no > longer works. > > I think Thomas resisted going the RB-tree route earlier.. The only problem I see with the RB tree is the performance overhead and people are constantly complaining about futex performance anyway. But it might be worth a try. Thanks, tglx
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC] futex: hashbucket as list of futex instead of waiters Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-09-28 13:00 +0200
Re: [RFC] futex: hashbucket as list of futex instead of waiters Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-09-28 14:20 +0200
Re: [RFC] futex: hashbucket as list of futex instead of waiters Gerd Gerats <gerd.gerats.lkml@gmx.de> - 2017-09-29 00:50 +0200
Re: [RFC] futex: hashbucket as list of futex instead of waiters Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-09-29 10:40 +0200
csiph-web