Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1741469

Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm] f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm] f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault
Date 2017-09-28 14:00 +0200
Message-ID <uuFDX-8w4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <uuBTJ-6bp-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuBTK-6bp-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuCd4-6xg-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <uuCG6-6IC-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:49:41AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Sure, but its still an officially supported GCC version. So either it
> > must be made to work, or we must update the minimal GCC version
> > requirements for the kernel.
> 
> Of course! I just mean I'd not be surprised if this was a GCC bug/quirk
> with legacy GCC versions that probably won't be fixed.

Ah, I recently had a case where this old GCC-4.4 crashed on 'obviously'
broken code while newer GCC's somehow made it 'work'.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm]  f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-09-28 10:00 +0200
  Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm]  f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-09-28 10:20 +0200
    Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm]  f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-09-28 10:50 +0200
      Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm]  f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-09-28 14:00 +0200

csiph-web