Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1740352
| From | Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 5/5] vhost_net: basic tx virtqueue batched processing |
| Date | 2017-09-27 04:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uu9Xr-4tR-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <usrc5-3JR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <usrc6-3JR-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <uu3Im-pY-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2017年09月27日 03:25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 04:02:35PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> This patch implements basic batched processing of tx virtqueue by >> prefetching desc indices and updating used ring in a batch. For >> non-zerocopy case, vq->heads were used for storing the prefetched >> indices and updating used ring. It is also a requirement for doing >> more batching on top. For zerocopy case and for simplicity, batched >> processing were simply disabled by only fetching and processing one >> descriptor at a time, this could be optimized in the future. >> >> XDP_DROP (without touching skb) on tun (with Moongen in guest) with >> zercopy disabled: >> >> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz: >> Before: 3.20Mpps >> After: 3.90Mpps (+22%) >> >> No differences were seen with zerocopy enabled. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> > So where is the speedup coming from? I'd guess the ring is > hot in cache, it's faster to access it in one go, then > pass many packets to net stack. Is that right? > > Another possibility is better code cache locality. Yes, I think the speed up comes from: - less cache misses - less cache line bounce when virtqueue is about to be full (guest is faster than host which is the case of MoonGen) - less memory barriers - possible faster copy speed by using copy_to_user() on modern CPUs > > So how about this patchset is refactored: > > 1. use existing APIs just first get packets then > transmit them all then use them all Looks like current API can not get packets first, it only support get packet one by one (if you mean vhost_get_vq_desc()). And used ring updating may get more misses in this case. > 2. add new APIs and move the loop into vhost core > for more speedups I don't see any advantages, looks like just need some e.g callbacks in this case. Thanks
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH net-next RFC 0/5] batched tx processing in vhost_net Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-22 10:10 +0200
[PATCH net-next RFC 5/5] vhost_net: basic tx virtqueue batched processing Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-22 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 5/5] vhost_net: basic tx virtqueue batched processing "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-09-26 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 5/5] vhost_net: basic tx virtqueue batched processing Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-27 04:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 5/5] vhost_net: basic tx virtqueue batched processing "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-09-28 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 5/5] vhost_net: basic tx virtqueue batched processing Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-28 09:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 5/5] vhost_net: basic tx virtqueue batched processing Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-28 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 5/5] vhost_net: basic tx virtqueue batched processing Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> - 2017-09-28 03:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 5/5] vhost_net: basic tx virtqueue batched processing Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-28 10:00 +0200
[PATCH net-next RFC 1/5] vhost: split out ring head fetching logic Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-22 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 1/5] vhost: split out ring head fetching logic Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 1/5] vhost: split out ring head fetching logic Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-25 04:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/5] batched tx processing in vhost_net "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-09-26 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/5] batched tx processing in vhost_net Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-27 02:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/5] batched tx processing in vhost_net "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-09-28 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/5] batched tx processing in vhost_net Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-28 09:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/5] batched tx processing in vhost_net "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-09-26 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/5] batched tx processing in vhost_net Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-09-27 04:10 +0200
csiph-web