Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1740312

Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] ipv4: Namespaceify tcp_fastopen_key knob

From 严海双 <yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] ipv4: Namespaceify tcp_fastopen_key knob
Date 2017-09-27 03:10 +0200
Message-ID <uu91o-3RZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <uswv8-6Hm-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <utKZ4-4P8-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <utMRc-65i-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uu2CB-8fI-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



> On 2017年9月27日, at 上午2:18, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> 
> From: 严海双 <yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:25:51 +0800
> 
>>> On 2017年9月26日, at 上午7:24, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> From: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 21:48:43 +0800
>>> 
>>>> @@ -9,13 +9,18 @@
>>>> #include <net/inetpeer.h>
>>>> #include <net/tcp.h>
>>>> 
>>>> -struct tcp_fastopen_context __rcu *tcp_fastopen_ctx;
>>>> -
>>>> -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(tcp_fastopen_ctx_lock);
>>>> -
>>>> -void tcp_fastopen_init_key_once(bool publish)
>>>> +void tcp_fastopen_init_key_once(struct net *net)
>>> 
>>> Why did you remove the 'publish' logic from this function?
>>> 
>> 
>> I think this logic is not necessary now, in proc_tcp_fastopen_key, I have removed 
>> tcp_fastopen_init_key_once(false) where the ‘publish’ is false:
>> 
>> -		/* Generate a dummy secret but don't publish it. This
>> -		 * is needed so we don't regenerate a new key on the
>> -		 * first invocation of tcp_fastopen_cookie_gen
>> -		 */
>> -		tcp_fastopen_init_key_once(false);
>> -		tcp_fastopen_reset_cipher(user_key, TCP_FASTOPEN_KEY_LENGTH);
>> +		tcp_fastopen_reset_cipher(net, user_key, TCP_FASTOPEN_KEY_LENGTH);
>> 
>> It said we don't regenerate a new key on first invocation of tcp_fastopen_cookie_gen, 
>> but in tcp_fastopen_cookie_gen,it didn’t  call tcp_fastopen_init_key_once since
>> from commit dfea2aa654243 (tcp: Do not call tcp_fastopen_reset_cipher from interrupt context):
>> 
>> And in other places where call tcp_fastopen_init_key_once, the ‘publish’ is always true:
> 
> Ok, this simplification seems legitimate.
> 
> But it is unrelated to this namespacification.  So it should be in a separate patch,
> and should be documented well in the commit message using the great explanation you
> gave to me above.
> 
> Please respin this series, with this patch #2 split up into two changes.
> 
> Thank you.

Okay, thanks David for advise. I will split the patch #2 in next commit.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v4 1/3] ipv4: Namespaceify tcp_fastopen knob Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com> - 2017-09-22 15:50 +0200
  [PATCH v4 3/3] ipv4: Namespaceify tcp_fastopen_blackhole_timeout knob Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com> - 2017-09-22 15:50 +0200
  [PATCH v4 2/3] ipv4: Namespaceify tcp_fastopen_key knob Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com> - 2017-09-22 15:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] ipv4: Namespaceify tcp_fastopen_key knob David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-09-26 01:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] ipv4: Namespaceify tcp_fastopen_key knob 严海双 <yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com> - 2017-09-26 03:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] ipv4: Namespaceify tcp_fastopen_key knob David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-09-26 20:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] ipv4: Namespaceify tcp_fastopen_key knob 严海双 <yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com> - 2017-09-27 03:10 +0200

csiph-web