Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1739256
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/8] sched: Consistent task-state printing |
| Date | 2017-09-25 22:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <utHRw-2MV-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <utAwF-6f6-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <utAwG-6f6-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:07:48 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> +static inline char __task_state_to_char(unsigned int state)
> +{
> + static const char state_char[] = "RSDTtXZ";
> +
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(1 + ilog2(TASK_REPORT) != sizeof(state_char) - 2);
>
> - return state < sizeof(stat_nam) - 1 ? stat_nam[state] : '?';
> + return state_char[state];
> +}
> +
> +static inline char task_state_to_char(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + return __task_state_to_char(__get_task_state(tsk));
> }
>
So far I'm fine with the patch set, but I hate the non descriptive "__"
prefix of __task_state_to_char(). Can we make this a bit more
descriptive, because every time I see it in other patches, I go back to
this patch to see if we are using the right function.
What about something like:
task_state_to_state_char(unsigned int state);
task_to_state_char(struct task_struct *tsk);
?
This way, the "__" wont keep making me think we used the wrong
function.
-- Steve
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/8] sched: Consistent task-state printing Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-09-25 14:20 +0200 Re: [PATCH 1/8] sched: Consistent task-state printing Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-09-25 22:10 +0200
csiph-web