Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1739117

Re: [Question] null pointer risk of kernel workqueue

From Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [Question] null pointer risk of kernel workqueue
Date 2017-09-25 17:30 +0200
Message-ID <utDuz-8b2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <usOBI-18b-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hello,

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 05:04:24PM +0800, tanxiaofei wrote:
> Hi Tejun & Jiangshan,
> 
> I find an null pointer risk in the code of workqueue. Here is description:
> 
> If draining, __queue_work() will call the function is_chained_work() to do some checks.
> In is_chained_work(), worker->current_pwq is used directly. It should be not safe.
> http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/kernel/workqueue.c#L1384
> 
> If you check the thread function of this worker, worker_thread(), you will find worker->current_pwq
> is null when one work is done or ready to be processed.
> This issue may happen only if we queue work during executing drain_workqueue().
> http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/kernel/workqueue.c#L2173

Hmmm? I don't get it.  worker->current_pwq is guaranteed to be set
while a work function is being executed and the chained check can only
get there iff the the worker is executing a work function.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[Question] null pointer risk of kernel workqueue tanxiaofei <tanxiaofei@huawei.com> - 2017-09-23 11:10 +0200
  Re: [Question] null pointer risk of kernel workqueue Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-09-25 17:30 +0200

csiph-web