Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1739103
| From | Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: n900 in next-20170901 |
| Date | 2017-09-25 17:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <utD1v-7Jk-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <upaKt-4rT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <upiRI-1k2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <upSLv-7CH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <usdsu-3Vx-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <utwCK-3Gy-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> [170925 01:06]: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:28:11AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> [170914 23:55]: > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 09:31:27AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > Yes I disabled CONFIG_HIGHMEM and n900 boots. To disable it, > > > > you need to remove it from arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig that > > > > selects it if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS_TYPICAL is selected. > > > > > > Okay. Problem would be related to address traslation. I'd like to > > > check address traslation more. Could you apply following patch and > > > test it? And, please send me the dmesg log and your kernel config. > > > Please test this with CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL = n and CONFIG_CMA_DEBUG=y and > > > CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y and with kernel bootparam 'ignore_loglevel'. > > > > > > It would be really appreciate if you send me two logs for before/after > > > commit 9caf25f996e8. > > > > Sorry for the delays, I finally got around testing this for you. > > No problem! I really appreciate your help! > > > Compile with your patch failed for modules with __virt_to_phys_debug > > being undefined so I added EXPORT_SYMBOL there. I also enabled DEBUG_LL > > and EARLYPRINTK to get output. > > > > Below is dmesg output for 9caf25f996e8 + your patch. I'll send you > > the full logs separately. > > Hmm...there is only one caller for the CMA memory, that is, atomic_pool_init(). > Could you test one more time with 9caf25f996e8 + following patch? I'd like to > know the actual user for the CMA memory. Hmm not getting any stack with that patch after manually applying it because of tabs to spaces mangling. Regards, Tony > -------------------------->8------------------------ > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c > index 519c294..c68f34a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c > @@ -587,6 +587,8 @@ static void *__alloc_from_pool(size_t size, struct page **ret_page) > ptr = (void *)val; > } > > + dump_stack(); > + > return ptr; > } >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: n900 in next-20170901 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2017-09-13 10:00 +0200
Re: n900 in next-20170901 Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-09-13 18:40 +0200
Re: n900 in next-20170901 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2017-09-15 09:00 +0200
Re: n900 in next-20170901 Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-09-21 19:30 +0200
Re: n900 in next-20170901 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2017-09-25 10:10 +0200
Re: n900 in next-20170901 Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-09-25 17:00 +0200
csiph-web