Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1737441
| From | Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [BACKPORT] swiotlb-xen: implement xen_swiotlb_dma_mmap callback |
| Date | 2017-09-22 14:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <usv61-5Zz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <upLK1-30B-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uqa5I-2Li-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <ur8Ex-1lQ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 18/09/17 20:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Greg KH wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 04:23:05PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We are getting reports from Xen on ARM users about DMA issues. The >>> problem is that the commit below >>> (7e91c7df29b5e196de3dc6f086c8937973bd0b88) is necessary to support mmap >>> on Xen on ARM. It is self-contained and doesn't affect anything outside >>> of Xen on ARM, so I think is a good candidate for backporting. It went >>> upstream in 4.11. >> >> But it's a new feature, right? How does that fit the stable kernel >> rules? > > It implements a previously unimplemented function (mmap), although it > calls the generic functions to do it. Yes, I agree with you that it > can be classified as a new feature. If that is against the stable kernel > rules, then please discard this request. > > FYI the reason why it didn't raise a flag in my mind is that users > reported something like "unhandled alignment fault (11) at > 0xffffa6048080, esr 0x92000061", which really looks more like a bug. > > >>> Could you please backport the following commit: >>> >>> commit 7e91c7df29b5e196de3dc6f086c8937973bd0b88 >>> Author: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> >>> Date: Tue Feb 7 19:58:02 2017 +0200 >>> >>> swiotlb-xen: implement xen_swiotlb_dma_mmap callback >>> >>> This function creates userspace mapping for the DMA-coherent memory. >>> >>> to the stable trees up until 3.14? >>> >>> >>> Because of 00085f1efa387a8ce100e3734920f7639c80caa3 "dma-mapping: use >>> unsigned long for dma_attrs", the appended patch (to be applied on top) >>> is required for trees older than 4.8. >> >> What does the kvm maintainers think about this? > > That would be the Xen maintainers right? In that case, Boris, Juergen, > please let us know what you think. > I have no specific preference. Juergen
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[BACKPORT] swiotlb-xen: implement xen_swiotlb_dma_mmap callback Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2017-09-15 01:30 +0200
Re: [BACKPORT] swiotlb-xen: implement xen_swiotlb_dma_mmap callback Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-09-16 03:30 +0200
Re: [BACKPORT] swiotlb-xen: implement xen_swiotlb_dma_mmap callback Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2017-09-18 20:10 +0200
Re: [BACKPORT] swiotlb-xen: implement xen_swiotlb_dma_mmap callback Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2017-09-18 21:00 +0200
Re: [BACKPORT] swiotlb-xen: implement xen_swiotlb_dma_mmap callback Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2017-09-20 00:00 +0200
Re: [BACKPORT] swiotlb-xen: implement xen_swiotlb_dma_mmap callback Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2017-09-21 02:40 +0200
Re: [BACKPORT] swiotlb-xen: implement xen_swiotlb_dma_mmap callback Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2017-09-22 14:20 +0200
csiph-web