Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1737040

Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: rewrite confusing statement about memory barriers

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: rewrite confusing statement about memory barriers
Date Thu, 21 Sep 2017 22:00:02 +0200
Message-ID <usfNE-5au-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <usfkC-50V-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <usfND-5au-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Tm-As-Gconf 00
X-Cbid 17092119-0044-0000-0000-000003938BB9
X-Ibm-Spammodules-Versions BY=3.00007774; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000231; SDB=6.00920372; UDB=6.00462470; IPR=6.00700595; BA=6.00005601; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00017240; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2017-09-21 19:53:50
X-Ibm-Av-Detection SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused
X-Cbparentid 17092119-0045-0000-0000-000007C28FEE
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-09-21_05:,, signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1709210267
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 48
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net
X-Original-Date Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:53:45 -0300
X-Original-Message-ID <24b095bd-39f2-4a9b-2064-9ca38fa77380@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
X-Original-References <20170921192901.19206-1-gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170921195058.GM3521@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
X-Original-Sender linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref csiph.com linux.kernel:1737040

Show key headers only | View raw


On 09/21/2017 04:50 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 04:29:01PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
>> In this specific portion of the write memory barriers description,
>> the documentation mentions sequential order of stores, which is
>> confusing since sequential ordering is not guaranteed.
>>
>> This patch tries to improve the doc in order to avoid any
>> mis-understanding.
>>
>> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Good catch, and you are quite correct, a write barrier orders only
> before and after itself, doing nothing to impose order on preceding
> writes among themselves.

That's nice, thanks a lot Paul! :)

> 
> Applied, thank you!
> 
> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
>> ---
>>
>> v2: added Paul in CC.
>>
>>  Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
>> index b759a60624fd..a4bbbd1b63a0 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
>> @@ -383,8 +383,8 @@ Memory barriers come in four basic varieties:
>>       to have any effect on loads.
>>
>>       A CPU can be viewed as committing a sequence of store operations to the
>> -     memory system as time progresses.  All stores before a write barrier will
>> -     occur in the sequence _before_ all the stores after the write barrier.
>> +     memory system as time progresses.  All stores _before_ a write barrier
>> +     will occur _before_ all the stores after the write barrier.
>>
>>       [!] Note that write barriers should normally be paired with read or data
>>       dependency barriers; see the "SMP barrier pairing" subsection.
>> -- 
>> 2.14.1
>>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2] Documentation: rewrite confusing statement about memory barriers "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-09-21 21:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: rewrite confusing statement about  memory barriers "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-09-21 22:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: rewrite confusing statement about  memory barriers "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-09-21 22:00 +0200

csiph-web